2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00039-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How atypical is atypical language dominance?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
85
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, a subset of the participants took part in an fMRI based validation study. This study comprised the assessment of hemispheric dominance for language production, in a set-up employing a mental word generation task known to produce marked lateralization, in both fMRI and fTCD settings, which is in agreement with the lateralization determined by a Wada test (Knecht et al, 2000(Knecht et al, , 2001(Knecht et al, , 2003.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, a subset of the participants took part in an fMRI based validation study. This study comprised the assessment of hemispheric dominance for language production, in a set-up employing a mental word generation task known to produce marked lateralization, in both fMRI and fTCD settings, which is in agreement with the lateralization determined by a Wada test (Knecht et al, 2000(Knecht et al, , 2001(Knecht et al, , 2003.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Each laterality index (fMRI LI) was derived by the formula The above method for LI calculation has been applied successfully in several studies (e.g., Knecht et al, 2003;Rutten, Ramsey, van Rijen & van Veelen, 2002) and can be used to reliably identify hemispheric dominance for language. There is a debate, however, regarding the reproducibility of the degree of laterality indicated in the LI values.…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using the WFU PickAtlas Tool Version, 2.4 (Maldjian et al, 2003), we defined maskvolumes which masked all brain activations except those in the left or right Cg25 7 containing both activated and non-activated voxels in proportions depending on the general activity level of each individual. To take this inter-subject variability into account, we adjusted the threshold for the activation pixels for each subject using a technique that was introduced earlier by a number of other authors in order to improve the robustness of lateralization measures (Fernández et al, 2001;Knecht et al, 2003;Jansen et al, 2006). In a first step, we calculated the means of the 5% highest T-values in the left and right Cg25 regions as defined by the mask.…”
Section: Image Acquisition and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For language, a number of studies have addressed the funtional topography in subjects with atypical right-hemisphere language dominance (HubrichUngureanu et al, 2002;Staudt et al, 2002;Knecht et al, 2003;Jansen et al, 2004b). The underlying neuroanatomic correlates for attention are largely unknown, however.…”
Section: Theories On Cerebral Lateralizationmentioning
confidence: 99%