2017
DOI: 10.1080/2159676x.2016.1272480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How athletes conceptualise doping, winning, and consequences: insights from using the cognitive interviewing technique with the Goldman dilemma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to the fact that the illegal advantage gained by one athlete has a relatively marginal effect on the result of the game. This comparative aspect was also reflected in a study by Woolf and Mazanov (2017). However, while a difference was found concerning doping between athletes at different competitive levels, no differences were found in the perceptions of athletes from individual and team sports.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is due to the fact that the illegal advantage gained by one athlete has a relatively marginal effect on the result of the game. This comparative aspect was also reflected in a study by Woolf and Mazanov (2017). However, while a difference was found concerning doping between athletes at different competitive levels, no differences were found in the perceptions of athletes from individual and team sports.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Thus, local norms of competitive behavior shape the perceptions of young athletes. Furthermore, the competitive level may have an impact, as found in the studies of Woolf and Mazanov (2017) . According to their study, the differences in ethical perceptions between the team and individual athletes decrease when the level of play is non-competitive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Notably, athletes' desire for results and their competitive nature sometimes motivate them to become high performers (Jordalen, Lemyre, and Durand-Bush 2019). The athletes' main intentions of commodity aspects (Barker-Ruchti et al, 2014) could also be a matter of their maturity and experience, as athletes' attitudes regarding athletic progression at 'any costs' may change as they grow older (Woolf and Mazanov 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been recognized that the decision behind doping is a complex psychological process involving environmental and social cognitive factors (Lazuras, 2015;Hauw, 2017;Petróczi et al, 2017;Woolf & Mazanov, 2017). Introduced to doping research by Petróczi et al (2017), the Behavioural Reasoning Theory (Westaby, 2005) explains not only the planned actions but the motives underpinning human behaviors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%