2019
DOI: 10.1101/833541
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Array Design affects SNP Ascertainment Bias

Abstract: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), genotyped with SNP arrays, have become the most widely used marker types in population genetic analyses over the last 10 years. However, compared to whole genome re-sequencing data, arrays are known to lack a substantial proportion of globally rare variants and tend to be biased towards variants present in populations involved in the development process of the respective array. This affects population genetic estimators and is known as SNP ascertainment bias. We investig… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A limitation of the other two Bos genus (YAK and BLI) datasets are the genomic datasets, in which genotyping platforms developed for cattle (a closely related Bovidae species) were used. This might have resulted in ascertainment bias ( Lachance and Tishkoff, 2013 ; Malomane et al, 2018 ; Geibel et al, 2019 ) in the results of YAK and BLI, as discussed later. Genotypic quality control (QC) was implemented for all breeds together.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A limitation of the other two Bos genus (YAK and BLI) datasets are the genomic datasets, in which genotyping platforms developed for cattle (a closely related Bovidae species) were used. This might have resulted in ascertainment bias ( Lachance and Tishkoff, 2013 ; Malomane et al, 2018 ; Geibel et al, 2019 ) in the results of YAK and BLI, as discussed later. Genotypic quality control (QC) was implemented for all breeds together.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in a shift of the allele frequency spectrum towards mean allele frequencies and thereby an overestimation of heterozygosity compared to whole genome resequencing (WGS) data. As this overestimation is stronger for populations involved in the array design (discovery populations) than for those not involved [9], follow-up analyses can be biased. This effect is widely known as SNP Ascertainment Bias [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, SNP chips (or genotyping array) data tends to underrepresent rare variants that are likely to be detected in sequence data like the one used in this study. Since the extent of LD ( r 2 ) depends on MAF, it is expected that there would be a little difference in the r 2 value obtained from both studies, partly due to SNP ascertainment bias on SNP chip data ( Lachance and Tishkoff, 2013 ; Geibel et al, 2019 ). This kind of bias was reduced in a recent study by Huang et al (2020) which had more Chinese breeds represented in the design of the SNP array used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%