2019
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How are visual words represented? Insights from EEG‐based visual word decoding, feature derivation and image reconstruction

Abstract: Investigations into the neural basis of reading have shed light on the cortical locus and the functional role of visual‐orthographic processing. Yet, the fine‐grained structure of neural representations subserving reading remains to be clarified. Here, we capitalize on the spatiotemporal structure of electroencephalography (EEG) data to examine if and how EEG patterns can serve to decode and reconstruct the internal representation of visually presented words in healthy adults. Our results show that word classi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We report in Figure 3 the averaged results for the time-resolved classification of coarse-grained categories, where we classify evoked responses at time t into two classes, either person or place. Classification accuracy raises intermittently above the baseline level from around 150 ms after stimulus onset, which is compatible with visual word recognition processes starting at around 150 ms (Carreiras et al, 2014 ; Ling et al, 2019 )—but never reaches significance while the stimulus in on screen. We interpret this as an effect of the variable control procedure for word length described in Section 3.4, given that it is in this time range that semantics and word-reading processes can get confounded.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…We report in Figure 3 the averaged results for the time-resolved classification of coarse-grained categories, where we classify evoked responses at time t into two classes, either person or place. Classification accuracy raises intermittently above the baseline level from around 150 ms after stimulus onset, which is compatible with visual word recognition processes starting at around 150 ms (Carreiras et al, 2014 ; Ling et al, 2019 )—but never reaches significance while the stimulus in on screen. We interpret this as an effect of the variable control procedure for word length described in Section 3.4, given that it is in this time range that semantics and word-reading processes can get confounded.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Of particular relevance here, recent work has found evidence for the ability of EEG pattern analyses to support the decoding of facial identity (Ambrus et al, ; Nemrodov, Niemeier, Patel, & Nestor, ), visual words (Chan, Halgren, Marinkovic, & Cash, ; Ling, Lee, Armstrong, & Nestor, ), and face ensembles (Roberts, Cant, & Nestor, ) suggesting a promising strategy to address cross‐category commonalities in neural dynamics through multivariate analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Word processing was assessed based on the data of 14 participants (9 females, age: 20–26) who performed a one‐back identity task with three‐letter consonant–vowel–consonant (CVC) nouns (Ling et al, ). Each of 80 words was presented for 300 ms, followed by a variable 600–700 ms intertrial interval (ITI), and was repeated 96 times (i.e., 3 times per block across 32 blocks).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recordings of brain activity play an important role in furthering our understanding of how human language works (Murphy et al, 2018 ; Ling et al, 2019 ). The appeal and added value of using brain activity signals in linguistic research are intelligible (Stemmer and Connolly, 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%