2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2435206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Are Small Banks Faring Under Dodd-Frank?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Deregulatory policies allowed banks to grow in size, serve larger geographic regions, and take on additional risks (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 1997), precipitating banks' divestment from local communities in favor of serving more profitable communities (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 1997; Apgar and Herbert, 2006). For example, from 1985 to 2013, the number of banks and savings institutions that served higher‐income communities increased by 40%, while the number of small banks (i.e., those with less than $100 million in assets) often located in lower‐income communities declined by 85% (Peirce et al ., 2014).…”
Section: A History Of Redlining In Financial Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deregulatory policies allowed banks to grow in size, serve larger geographic regions, and take on additional risks (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 1997), precipitating banks' divestment from local communities in favor of serving more profitable communities (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 1997; Apgar and Herbert, 2006). For example, from 1985 to 2013, the number of banks and savings institutions that served higher‐income communities increased by 40%, while the number of small banks (i.e., those with less than $100 million in assets) often located in lower‐income communities declined by 85% (Peirce et al ., 2014).…”
Section: A History Of Redlining In Financial Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Введение контрциклического буфера также повлекло за собой сокращение предложения кредитов [9]. Возросшее вследствие принятия закона Додда-Франка регулятивное бремя значительно увеличило издержки маленьких банков и заставило их сократить линейку предлагаемых ипотечных кредитов [10].…”
Section: тенденции посткризисного финансового регулирования в сшаunclassified
“…According to them, the Dodd-Frank which was claimed to be targeted to the end of 'too big to fail' institutions, has finished to hamper households and small-and medium-sized community financial institutions. In fact, instead of ending 'too big to fail,' Dodd-Frank created 'too small to succeed' (Lux and Greene, 2015;Pierce et al 2014;Rapoport, 2014;Brewer and Jagtiani, 2013). This is because the largest Wall Street firms were the beneficiaries rather than the victims of Dodd-Frank: the law has both cemented their status as 'too big to fail' and has conferred an advantage on firms with the size and scale to absorb the complex new regulatory mandates (Prabha and Wihlborg, 2014).…”
Section: Critics To the Dodd-frank Act And Its Future Under The Trumpmentioning
confidence: 99%