2017
DOI: 10.12705/665.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How apomictic taxa are treated in current taxonomy: A review

Abstract: Gametophytic apomixis (asexual seed formation without syngamy of female and male gametes) is a highly interesting mechanism for researchers in plant biotechnology, genetics, evolutionary biology, and taxonomy. Apomixis evolved repeatedly and independently in the evolution of multiple genera. It is an effective reproduction barrier and, consequently, conserved apomictic genotypes may become overrepresented in nature. Apomictic plants may easily colonize free niches with only one or a few individuals and outcomp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
31
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 194 publications
(293 reference statements)
0
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Basically these categories follow a gradient from obligate sexuality to obligate asexuality. Other than Majeský & al. (2017) I will not provide detailed literature reviews of plant genera with gametophytic apomixis, but rather show how presently known apomictic plants would fit into these four approaches to species delimitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Basically these categories follow a gradient from obligate sexuality to obligate asexuality. Other than Majeský & al. (2017) I will not provide detailed literature reviews of plant genera with gametophytic apomixis, but rather show how presently known apomictic plants would fit into these four approaches to species delimitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few decades, the practice for taxonomists working with apomictic plants has been to follow the rather pragmatic views of genus-wise classifications, and quite often genus-specific concepts exist (Haveman, 2013;Majeský & al., 2017). The disadvantage of genus-specific concepts for assessment of overall biodiversity is that the resulting species are not readily comparable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rough estimates suggest the genus contains approximately 2,800 species in approximately 60 sections (Kirschner et al 2015), with the higher diversity in the mountains of Eurasia (Ge et al 2011); a total of 1,900 species in 35 sections are listed for Europe (Kirschner et al 2007). The complexity of Taraxacum taxonomy is caused by its combination of different reproduction strategies, including sexual reproduction (mainly outcrossing, less frequently selfing) and apomixis (meiotic diplospory; Richards 1973, Asker and Jerling 1992, Kirschner and Štěpánek 1994, Kirschner et al 1994, Majeský et al 2017). The vast majority of Taraxacum taxa are apomictic polyploid microspecies, only a few species are sexual diploids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diploid number (2n = 2x = 16) is confined to only sexually reproducing species, and sexual species are nearly all diploids, with only a few exceptions of sexual tetraploids known in section Piesis (Kirschner and Štěpánek 1994, 1998a, Trávníček et al 2013). In contrast, apomictic species are never diploids but always polyploids (Majeský et al 2017), having one of the genes involved in regulation of apomixis ( DIPLOSPOROUS ) located on the NOR chromosome (Vašut et al 2014). Most of the known chromosome numbers for apomictic Taraxacum species are at a triploid level (2n = 3x = 24), especially those of the widespread European sections Taraxacum sect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mechanism allowed to fix not only a huge number of morphologically well-differentiated polyploid taxa, but also a myriad of phenotypically very close morphotypes arisen from crosses of the same phenotypically variable parental taxa. As a consequence, roughly between 500 and 10,000 polyploid apomictic species/ microspecies (Zahn, 1921(Zahn, -1923Greuter, 2006-;IPNI, 2019), depending on the taxonomic concept (e.g., Zahn, 1921Zahn, -1923Schuhwerk, 2002;Tyler, 2006;Majeský & al., 2017), have been recognized. This holds also for the last two decades when some tens of new polyploid microspecies were described from different parts of the genus range (e.g., Chrtek & Marhold, 1998;Rich, 2011;Szeląg & Vladimirov, 2013;Di Gristina & al., 2014;Sennikov, 2014;Gottschlich & Pils, 2016;Tyler, 2017;Nilsson & Tyler, 2018;Szeląg, 2018).…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%