2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.5000071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How anomalous resistivity accelerates magnetic reconnection

Abstract: Whether turbulence induced anomalous resistivity (AR) can facilitate a fast magnetic reconnection in collisionless plasma is a subject of active debate for decades.Recent space observations suggest that the reconnection rate can be higher than the Hall-reconnection rate and turbulent dissipation is required. In this paper, using

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(103 reference statements)
4
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that the four MMS spacecraft recorded powers between 10 and 30 nW/m 3 , we conclude that fast reconnection of at least 0.1 was observed on 22 October. As discussed by Che (), the reconnection rate undoubtedly has a large variation in time as the spacecraft sample highly variable current sheets and may have been even greater, up to values close to 1, during this encounter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given that the four MMS spacecraft recorded powers between 10 and 30 nW/m 3 , we conclude that fast reconnection of at least 0.1 was observed on 22 October. As discussed by Che (), the reconnection rate undoubtedly has a large variation in time as the spacecraft sample highly variable current sheets and may have been even greater, up to values close to 1, during this encounter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Given that the four MMS spacecraft recorded powers between 10 and 30 nW/m 3 , we conclude that fast reconnection of at least 0.1 was observed on 22 October. As discussed by Che (2017), the reconnection rate undoubtedly has a large variation in time as the spacecraft sample highly variable current sheets and may have been even greater, up to values close to 1, during this encounter. Some other features reported here are not commonly seen in simulations to our knowledge: the smallscale Hall-like current structure at the EDR, and the very sharp reversal of these currents within the current layer, sometimes resulting in a negative value of E || × J || ; the electromagnetic emission in the EDR above the electron gyrofrequency; the enigmatic diamagnetic cavity which does not resemble O-type flux ropes, as reported for example in , but has been observed at other encounters of the EDR .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In collisionless plasmas an appropriate model for resistivity can also be determined from Particle-in-Cell simulations (e.g. Che 2017) or by directly integrating Vlasov's kinetic equation (Büchner & Elkina 2005;Büchner & Elkina 2006). In non-relativistic plasmas the effects of anomalous resistivity have been studied extensively, concluding that localized resistivity can enable the fast Petschek (1964) reconnection mechanism (see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the scale on which these effects operate is not captured in fluid models, we cannot know the 'correct' values of the parameters. However, since resistivity sets the timescale on which the reconnection unfolds, we can fit the parameters to the timescales observed in the corona (∼ 10s -100s) (Che 2017). As a practical convenience, it sets a lower limit on the thickness of any current sheets which form, hence the threshold current j crit is chosen to be higher than that which would occur in a grid-scale current sheet.…”
Section: Lare2dmentioning
confidence: 99%