2012
DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2012.00068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How anatomy shapes dynamics: a semi-analytical study of the brain at rest by a simple spin model

Abstract: Resting state networks (RSNs) show a surprisingly coherent and robust spatiotemporal organization. Previous theoretical studies demonstrated that these patterns can be understood as emergent on the basis of the underlying neuroanatomical connectivity skeleton. Integrating the biologically realistic DTI/DSI-(Diffusion Tensor Imaging/Diffusion Spectrum Imaging)based neuroanatomical connectivity into a brain model of Ising spin dynamics, we found a system with multiple attractors, which can be studied analyticall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
138
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
7
138
0
Order By: Relevance
“…neural networks never reach a fully synchronized nor desynchronized state. Instead, the brain network dynamics exhibits large variability, and the amount of global synchrony of network nodes vary over time, indicating transitions from a synchronized to more desynchronized state 11,14 . This metastable state in brain dynamics can be quantified by the standard deviation σ R of the order parameter R(t) 9,36 .…”
Section: Measures Of the Network Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…neural networks never reach a fully synchronized nor desynchronized state. Instead, the brain network dynamics exhibits large variability, and the amount of global synchrony of network nodes vary over time, indicating transitions from a synchronized to more desynchronized state 11,14 . This metastable state in brain dynamics can be quantified by the standard deviation σ R of the order parameter R(t) 9,36 .…”
Section: Measures Of the Network Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereafter, a lot of interest has been devoted to deepening the understanding of how anatomical constraints shape functional connectivity (Honey et al 2010;Breakspear et al 2010;Cabral et al 2011;Deco et al 2012), and how this relationship can be affected by different pathologies (de Kwaasteniet et al 2013;van Schouwenburg et al 2013). In most of these studies, either the dynamics of FC are not taken into account, or it is modeled, but the information coming from the data and used to assess models is deduced with a static approach of FC [e.g., (Deco et al 2013b)].…”
Section: Phases Of (De)synchronization Between Functional and Structumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different approaches have been used to tackle this question, such as direct comparison of functional and structural connectivities (Kötter and Sommer 2000;Sporns et al 2000), graph theory (Passingham et al 2002;Bullmore and Sporns 2009), and model-based approaches to explain the link between SC and FC (Koch et al 2002). However, it is only recently that a clear link between SC and FC (Honey et al 2009;van den Heuvel et al 2009) [reviewed in Damoiseaux and Greicius (2009)] has been established, allowing for testable models (Honey et al 2010;Deco et al 2012). Meanwhile, the classical approach of assuming FC as constant during resting-state recordings (Bullmore and Sporns 2009;Friston 2011) has also evolved recently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine the link between network architecture and functional entropy we adopted the analytically solvable Ising spin glass model from Deco et al (2012). The model, which is isomorphic to the discrete Hopfield net (Hopfield, 1982), studies the characteristics of the attractor landscapes emerging in a spin glass neural model.…”
Section: Spin Glass Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computationally driven theories of cognition hypothesize that the brain may achieve integration of subsystems by flexibly arranging cortical areas into temporal functional networks in accordance with goal-related requirements (Baars, 2005;Ghosh et al 2008;Deco et al 2010). The exact nature as well as the size of the set of possible functional network configurations, referred to as the brain"s functional repertoire, has been suggested to relate directly to the structural architecture of the brain Deco et al 2012;Senden et al 2012). Network architectures that involve a scale free topology; meaning that the degree distribution follows a power law function indicating the existence of a small number of high-degree nodes, have been shown to be able to display a particularly diverse number of functional configurations ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%