2014
DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rru022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How air influences radiation dose deposition in multiwell culture plates: a Monte Carlo simulation of radiation geometry

Abstract: Radiation of experimental culture cells on plates with various wells can cause a risk of underdosage as a result of the existence of multiple air–water interfaces. The objective of our study was to quantify this error in culture plates with multiple wells. Radiation conditions were simulated with the GAMOS code, based on the GEANT4 code, and this was compared with a simulation performed with PENELOPE and measured data. We observed a slight underdosage of ∼4% on the most superficial half of the culture medium. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When using multiwell tissue culture plates, because of the multiple air-tissue interfaces, there is concern about dose homogeneity between and within wells, which can affect the interpretation of the results and introduce uncertainties in radiobiology experiments. There was up to 4% underdosing at the air-fluid interface in multiwell tissue culture plate wells but this was not seen at the bottom of wells where cells were attached and grown [27] and our results confirm this observation, which may alleviate some of these concerns.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…When using multiwell tissue culture plates, because of the multiple air-tissue interfaces, there is concern about dose homogeneity between and within wells, which can affect the interpretation of the results and introduce uncertainties in radiobiology experiments. There was up to 4% underdosing at the air-fluid interface in multiwell tissue culture plate wells but this was not seen at the bottom of wells where cells were attached and grown [27] and our results confirm this observation, which may alleviate some of these concerns.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Figure 4 illustrated the PDD curve of OSL dosimeters in comparison to EBT3 film and TPS in in the presence of air cavities of 3, 5 and 8 cm thicknesses. The presence of air cavities significantly reduced the depth dose in all air cavity thicknesses [11]. The depth dose in OSL dosimeters showed good agreement with EBT3 film dosimeters at all air cavity thicknesses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Inadequate consideration of buildup and backscatter materials may result in unexpected or undiscovered errors in radiation dose administered to cells in culture plates. The discrepancy between the prescribed and measured dose for adherent cells in a culture plate may be 1.5% to 4%, depending on the setup and irradiation conditions (Kulmala et al 1995, Tomic et al 2007, Sabater et al 2014. Without adequate consideration of the conditions in which cells are exposed, cell viability data may not precisely reflect a response to the stated prescription dose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%