1987
DOI: 10.1016/0273-2297(87)90007-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How age changes in knowledge base contribute to the development of children's memory: An interpretive review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

12
234
1
24

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 303 publications
(271 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
12
234
1
24
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with previous research, this supports the notion that existing verbal LTM knowledge can have a top-down influence upon verbal STM in those with DS (Brock & Jarrold, 2004;Raitano Lee, Pennington, & Keenan, 2010), as well as being consistent with previous evidence that those with DS do organise semantic items in a similar nature to those without DS (Nash & Snowling, 2008). Bjorklund (1987) suggested that once semantic knowledge is obtained it can influence STM recall quite effortlessly. While the DS group did experience a significant benefit of semantic relation in the current study (this effect was significant in the original comparison, and just nearing significance for the retest data, p = .05), they nevertheless displayed less benefit from the semantically related arrangement of items than did the TD group, even though the two groups were well matched for vocabulary knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In line with previous research, this supports the notion that existing verbal LTM knowledge can have a top-down influence upon verbal STM in those with DS (Brock & Jarrold, 2004;Raitano Lee, Pennington, & Keenan, 2010), as well as being consistent with previous evidence that those with DS do organise semantic items in a similar nature to those without DS (Nash & Snowling, 2008). Bjorklund (1987) suggested that once semantic knowledge is obtained it can influence STM recall quite effortlessly. While the DS group did experience a significant benefit of semantic relation in the current study (this effect was significant in the original comparison, and just nearing significance for the retest data, p = .05), they nevertheless displayed less benefit from the semantically related arrangement of items than did the TD group, even though the two groups were well matched for vocabulary knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This suggests that individuals with DS are not using the relatedness between the items as a cue to recall memoranda, or as an organisational strategy, to the same degree as those without DS. According to Bjorklund (1987), individuals' knowledge base can impact on their memory recall performance in three ways; these are, by increasing the accessibility of items, by facilitating the use of strategies and by activating relations between items. Importantly, Bjorklund noted that semantic relations among items are activated with very little effort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was also an instructive Age x Trial x Memory Process interaction, F (1, 150) = 11.57, MSE = .01, p < .001, the nature of which is apparent in Figure 5. A classic finding about memory development is that when children study and recall meaningful items, younger children are less likely than older children and adolescents to benefit from opportunities to extract meaning content (Bjorklund, 1987(Bjorklund, , 2004Bjorklund & Muir, 1988). Another, less well-known, result is that output interference has more pronounced effects on older children's recall than on younger children's (e.g., Brainerd, Olney, & Reyna, 1993).…”
Section: Repetition Has Opposite Effects On Direct Access From Reconsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, FTT suggests that because children are less likely to extract the gist of an experience than adults, they should be less susceptible to false memories. Indeed, memory studies have reliably shown that children are less able to link meaning to information and less likely to extract relationship between different parts of information within an experience than adults (see Bjorklund, 1987Bjorklund, , 2005Esposito, 1975).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, children's and adults' false memories vary in the degree of automaticity of associative activation which in turn is driven by developments in children's knowledge base (Howe, 2005;Howe & Wilkinson, 2011;Otgaar, Candel, Scoboria, & Merckelbach, 2010;Otgaar, Smeets, & Peters, 2012). False memory rates increase with age because children gain knowledge and experience through learning, practice, and exposure to new information which results in a better integrated memory network of conceptual representations and associative relations among concepts (Bjorklund, 1987(Bjorklund, , 2005.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%