2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-021-02965-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How adaptive capacity shapes the Adapt, React, Cope response to climate impacts: insights from small-scale fisheries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
24
1
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
24
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The general reasoning is that investment in these factors will increase adaptive capacity. Yet, much of this work has remained theoretical in nature, especially in relation to how coastal communities actually adapt to climate stressors (Siders 2019, Green et al 2021. Overlaying these theoretical frameworks from the adaptive capacity literature with the pragmatic mechanisms from access theory has allowed us to provide an empirically grounded understanding of (1) the most salient climate stressors impacting access to coastal harvest in a region of the Alaska Arctic, (2) the mediating mechanisms reported by harvesters to maintain access to coastal subsistence resources during times of rapid environmental change, and (3) potential adaptation responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The general reasoning is that investment in these factors will increase adaptive capacity. Yet, much of this work has remained theoretical in nature, especially in relation to how coastal communities actually adapt to climate stressors (Siders 2019, Green et al 2021. Overlaying these theoretical frameworks from the adaptive capacity literature with the pragmatic mechanisms from access theory has allowed us to provide an empirically grounded understanding of (1) the most salient climate stressors impacting access to coastal harvest in a region of the Alaska Arctic, (2) the mediating mechanisms reported by harvesters to maintain access to coastal subsistence resources during times of rapid environmental change, and (3) potential adaptation responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). We build on theoretical foundations of adaptive capacity literature, that is, the domains of learning and knowledge, diversity and flexibility, governance and institutions, natural capital, and access to assets that have been linked to adaptation in the coastal social-ecological literature (Bennett et al 2014, Whitney et al 2017, Green et al 2021, but apply them through the lens of access theory, which has been established and empirically tested in many settings (Myers and Hansen 2020). To do so, we combine and ground our framework using data from semi-structured interviews and environmental datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Frawley et al (2019) also investigated the heterogeneous perceptions of social-ecological change among small-scale fishers in the central Gulf of California, and they concluded that gear ownership and target species diversification were key factors in determining the cultural models through which fishers responded to changes in the resource system. More recently, Green et al (2021) conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate how responses to climate, environmental, and social change are influenced by domains of adaptive capacity in SSF of 20 countries, and founded that adaptive responses at the community level only occurred when the community had access to assets, in combination with other domains including diversity and flexibility, learning and knowledge, and natural capital. Galappaththi et al (2021) also analyzed how fisheriesdependent indigenous communities respond and adapt to climate change impacts in Canada and Sri Lanka.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small-scale fisheries are undergoing rapid socioeconomic and environmental changes due to overfishing, declining fishing stocks, and the degradation of marine and coastal landscapes. To match the high levels of uncertainty associated with the new scenarios, fishing communities have revised their local ecological knowledge and practices, diversified their livelihoods, and developed novel institutional arrangements (FAO, 2019;Aswani, 2020;Green et al, 2021). As part of these innovations to regulate the use of natural resources, a wide range of sectors and academic disciplines has renewed the call for co-management and user-rights frameworks (von Benda-Beckmann et al, 2016;Tilley et al, 2019;Villaseñor-Derbez et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%