2001
DOI: 10.1093/sleep/24.8.957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Accurately Does Wrist Actigraphy Identify the States of Sleep and Wakefulness?

Abstract: Low PV's and overestimation of sleep currently disqualify actigraphy as an accurate sleep-wake indicator. Actigraphy may, however, by useful for measuring circadian period and sleep-wake consolidation and has face validity as a measure of rest/activity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
140
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
140
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While most actigraphy validation studies discuss an overestimation of WASO in infants and children, 15,16,27 the direction of error in other pediatric 14 and adult studies is not as consistent. [28][29][30] It may be that as children age, the level of movement during sleep not associated with an awakening decreases. Alternatively, older children may be more likely to lie still when awake than younger children, either of which will result in the switch in the direction of bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most actigraphy validation studies discuss an overestimation of WASO in infants and children, 15,16,27 the direction of error in other pediatric 14 and adult studies is not as consistent. [28][29][30] It may be that as children age, the level of movement during sleep not associated with an awakening decreases. Alternatively, older children may be more likely to lie still when awake than younger children, either of which will result in the switch in the direction of bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 But sleep efficiency and latency may be overestimated by actigraphy as compared with PSG. 14,26,27 The sensitivity of actigraphy, which is its ability to identify sleep when PSG does so, is 86.6-94%, but its specificity, the ability to identify wakefulness when PSG does so, is only 32-36%. 26,27 Actigraphy may overestimate sleep in patients with limb hypomobility because of various reasons, including Parkinson's disease, joint diseases, or involvement of the nervous system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,26,27 The sensitivity of actigraphy, which is its ability to identify sleep when PSG does so, is 86.6-94%, but its specificity, the ability to identify wakefulness when PSG does so, is only 32-36%. 26,27 Actigraphy may overestimate sleep in patients with limb hypomobility because of various reasons, including Parkinson's disease, joint diseases, or involvement of the nervous system. 14 Low specificity and exaggerated sensitivity of actigraphic data are expected in patients with plegia or paresis of the arms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, measuring this sleep quality over long periods is very inconvenient, especially for the elderly, and measures are necessary to avoid the devices not being worn. For example, artifacts in Act records can be due to noncompliance (i.e., not wearing the device), breathing movements, postural blocking of arm movement and externally imposed movement, e.g., from riding in a moving vehicle (Pollak et al, 2001;Tryon, 2004). To remove such artifacts, many researchers routinely ask the participants to keep a log of the times they sleep and remove the device (Youngstedt et al, 2001;Cole et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%