2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2002.01839
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How accurately can the Extended Thomas-Fermi method describe the inner crust of a neutron star?

Matthew Shelley,
Alessandro Pastore

Abstract: We perform a systematic comparison between the results obtained by solving fully self-consistently the Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov equations, and those obtained using the semi-classical Extended Thomas-Fermi method, for various Wigner-Seitz cells within the inner crust of a neutron star. The lack of pairing correlations in the semi-classical approach leads to a large discrepancy between the two approaches. This discrepancy is well beyond the error of the quantum-mechanical calculation, and is related to spurious s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From ρ b = 0.013 fm −3 , when the neutron gas contribution starts to become more important, there is a remarkable agreement between the full HFB calculation and the ETFSI+pairing. This result confirms our previous hypothesis concerning the discrepancy observed between the two methods in reference [37]. At this density, the total energy difference between the two methods is less than 10 keV per particle.…”
Section: Hfb Vs Etfsi+pairingsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From ρ b = 0.013 fm −3 , when the neutron gas contribution starts to become more important, there is a remarkable agreement between the full HFB calculation and the ETFSI+pairing. This result confirms our previous hypothesis concerning the discrepancy observed between the two methods in reference [37]. At this density, the total energy difference between the two methods is less than 10 keV per particle.…”
Section: Hfb Vs Etfsi+pairingsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The main reason for this disagreement is probably related to the properties of the functional used to perform the calculations. In previous work [37], we compared the structure of some WS cells performing both ETFSI and HFB calculations using the same functional. We observed an energy discrepancy far larger than the estimated error of the HFB method [29], and we identified the cause as a lack of neutron pairing correlations [38] in the ETFSI approach [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach, originally developed for finite nuclei [41] and later adapted to neutron-star crusts [42][43][44], is to employ the extended Thomas-Fermi method with consistent shell corrections added perturbatively. This semiclassical approach provides a fast and fairly accurate approximation of the Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov equations [45], thus opening the door to systematic studies of neutron-star crusts, treating consistently both the outer and inner parts. I.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%