How Accurate is Web-Based Self-Reported Height, Weight, and Body Mass Index in Young Adults?

Abstract

BackgroundWeb-based approaches are an effective and convenient medium to deliver eHealth interventions. However, few studies have attempted to evaluate the accuracy of online self-reported weight, and only one has assessed the accuracy of online self-reported height and body mass index (BMI).ObjectiveThis study aimed to validate online self-reported height, weight, and calculated BMI against objectively measured data in young Australian adults.MethodsParticipants aged 18-35 years were recruited via advertisements on social media sites and reported their current height and weight as part of an online survey. They then subsequently had the same measures objectively assessed by a trained researcher.ResultsSelf-reported height was significantly overestimated by a mean of 1.36 cm (SD 1.93; P<.001), while self-reported weight was significantly underestimated by –0.55 kg (SD 2.03; P<.001). Calculated BMI was also underestimated by –0.56 kg/m2 (SD 0.08; P<.001). The discrepancy in reporting resulted in the misclassification of the BMI category of three participants. Measured and self-reported data were strongly positively correlated (height: r=.98, weight: r=.99, BMI: r=.99; P<.001). When accuracy was evaluated by BMI category and gender, weight remained significantly underreported by females (P=.002) and overweight/obese participants (P=.02).ConclusionsThere was moderate to high agreement between self-reported and measured anthropometric data. Findings suggest that online self-reported height and weight can be a valid method of collecting anthropometric data.

Clustering of adherence to personalised dietary recommendations and changes in healthy eating index within the Food4Me study

“…However, the validity of internet-based, self-reported 331 anthropometric data is high (42) and has been confirmed in the present study (26) . We were not 332 able to include dairy products as a dietary recommendation in the present analyses due to so 333 few individuals meeting the recommendation.…”

Association between sleep pattern and body mass index among undergraduate health colleges’ students at Qassim University, Saudi Arabia

“…However, although individuals generally underreport weight and overreport height, the correspondence between anthropometric and self-report measures tend to be high (generally above .94; e.g. [64,65] ) and it is unlikely that small inaccuracies in BMI would have dramatically impacted our correlational findings. Second, we have not measured students' level of daily physical activity or dietary intake.…”

“…[62,63] There are some proofs that sleep education programs and cognitive behavior interventions can improve sleep in college students. [65] The current study has restrictions that should be addressed. First the study was designed as an exploratory study depending on a reasonably limited evidence showing that continues disturbanceof sleep can produce increased body weights by altering metabolic function.…”

Gastric Bypass May Promote Weight Loss in Overweight Partners

“…Although family members received extensive instructions regarding these measurements, this may still have caused measurement bias, in particular among children between 12 and 17 years old, who may still be growing. Based on the literature, individuals overestimate their self-reported height and underestimate their self-reported weight, 15,16 although Christian et al 17 showed that self-reported weight following bypass surgery was close to the measured weight. Furthermore, since we were interested in BMI change over time, measurement bias may not have influenced our results to a large extent.…”