1989
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1989.01410060043009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Accurate Is Fine-Needle Biopsy in Malignant Neoplasia of the Pancreas?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These techniques have high specificity with a low risk of procedure related complications. [95][96][97] There are however two concerns regarding transperitoneal techniques, particularly relevant to patients with small and potentially resectable tumours. Firstly, there is a risk of a false negative result.…”
Section: Tissue Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques have high specificity with a low risk of procedure related complications. [95][96][97] There are however two concerns regarding transperitoneal techniques, particularly relevant to patients with small and potentially resectable tumours. Firstly, there is a risk of a false negative result.…”
Section: Tissue Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Percutaneous fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses is useful in selected patients. The technique is safe and generally reliable, 37,38 but is of limited value in patients in whom surgical exploration for attempted resection or palliation is planned. The reason for not using fine needle aspiration cytology or biopsy in potentially resectable lesions is two‐fold.…”
Section: Diagnosis and Stagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the majority of cases, the extent of disease identified by the combined use of these imaging techniques is sufficient to preclude surgery. If surgery is deemed inappropriate and a cure is not in prospect, diagnosis should be confirmed by percutaneous trans‐abdominal fine needle aspiration (FNA) or biopsy 52 –58 . Such confirmation is essential, not only to obtain more accurate data for prognosis, but also to exclude less common types of pancreatic tumour such as lymphoma or neuroendocrine tumours which may be amenable to other treatment modalities.…”
Section: Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%