2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3625958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How accurate are the nonlinear chemical Fokker-Planck and chemical Langevin equations?

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
161
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
7
161
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 As is discussed in Introduction, recent numerical studies support the validity of chemical Fokker-Planck equation up to smaller value of Ω than the range adopted for LNA. 7,31,32 In fact, we also demonstrated that the direct numerical simulations agree quite well with the predictions of chemical Fokker-Planck equation for all motifs marked by "+" or "++" in Fig. 1, where small-number effects are well reproduced by the chemical Fokker-Planck equation, rather than by the LNA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…26 As is discussed in Introduction, recent numerical studies support the validity of chemical Fokker-Planck equation up to smaller value of Ω than the range adopted for LNA. 7,31,32 In fact, we also demonstrated that the direct numerical simulations agree quite well with the predictions of chemical Fokker-Planck equation for all motifs marked by "+" or "++" in Fig. 1, where small-number effects are well reproduced by the chemical Fokker-Planck equation, rather than by the LNA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The various different approximations are all closely related, see, e.g., Ref. 11 for further details.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the system description with uncorrelated white noise in the Ito interpretation does not predict correctly the system behavior. This is not surprising because it has been known that for second-order reactions, the FPE with independent white noise is not accurate (Grima et al, 2011;Thomas et al, 2013). Different approaches have been introduced to resolve the discrepancy, exemplified by the colored noise approximations (Shahrezaei et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%