1993
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.70.541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How accurate are the ‘‘muonic’’ quadrupole moments in Eu?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The agreement between our values of the A factors and the values obtained with a Fabry-Perot spectrometer is good considering that the hfs in [2,3] was only partially resolved (FWHM in the order of 1 GHz) and the hfs was analyzed using a parametrization procedure. Our values of the B factors agree very well with the values in [ 11 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The agreement between our values of the A factors and the values obtained with a Fabry-Perot spectrometer is good considering that the hfs in [2,3] was only partially resolved (FWHM in the order of 1 GHz) and the hfs was analyzed using a parametrization procedure. Our values of the B factors agree very well with the values in [ 11 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The A and B factors are derived from the well-known expression for the energy contributions from the magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole interactions and are corrected for the differential Doppler shift (0.071%). The results are given in Table 1 together with other results obtained with the laser-ion beam technique [11 ], and results obtained with a double Fabry-Perot spectrometer [2,3]. The values presented in this work are the weighted mean of the results achieved for the different transitions with a common upper or lower level (c.f.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the spectral synthesis calculations, the Eu  line was substituted by its HFS components, calculated by us using Casimir's equation (Casimir 1963), and HFS laboratory data from Becker et al (1993), Broström et al (1995), Villemoes & Wang (1994), and Möller et al (1993). Isotope shift was taken into account, using data from Broström et al (1995) and the solar abundance isotopic ratio ε( 151 Eu)/ε( 153 Eu) = 1.00 ± 0.29 (Lawler et al 2001).…”
Section: Spectral Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%