How accurate are TD‐DFT excited‐state geometries compared to DFT ground‐state geometries?

Abstract

In this work, we take a different angle to the benchmarking of time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) for the calculation of excited-state geometries by extensively assessing how accurate such geometries are compared to ground-state geometries calculated with ordinary DFT. To this end, we consider 20 medium-sized aromatic organic compounds whose lowest singlet excited states are ideally suited for TD-DFT modeling and are very well described by the approximate coupledcluster singles and doubles (CC2) method, and then use this method and six different density functionals (BP86, B3LYP, PBE0, M06-2X, CAM-B3LYP, and ωB97XD) to optimize the corresponding ground-and excited-state geometries. The results show that although each hybrid functional reproduces the CC2 excited-state bond lengths very satisfactorily, achieving an overall root mean square error of 0.011 Å for all 336 bonds in the 20 molecules, these errors are distinctly larger than those of only 0.004-0.006 Å with which the hybrid functionals reproduce the CC2 ground-state bond lengths. Furthermore, for each functional employed, the variation in the error relative to CC2 between different molecules is found to be much larger (by at least a factor of 3) for the excited-state geometries than for the ground-state geometries, despite the fact that the molecules/states under investigation have rather uniform chemical and spectroscopic character. Overall, the study finds that even in favorable circumstances, TD-DFT excited-state geometries appear intrinsically and comparatively less accurate than DFT ground-state ones.

Heterohelicenes through 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition of Sydnones with Arynes: Synthesis, Origins of Selectivity, and Application to pH-Triggered Chiroptical Switch with CPL Sign Reversal

“…This method was chosen as it is known to provide accurate excited state geometries. 55 The ground state (S 0 ) and first excited state (S 1 ) were optimized for each compound and the oscillator and rotatory strengths of their first 100 vertical transitions were obtained, then fitted to Gaussian functions with a half-width at half-height of 0.2 eV. The resulting predicted spectra, along with selected transitions, are shown in Figure 4 with the spectra measured experimentally.…”

Bright NIR‐II Photoluminescence in Rod‐Shaped Icosahedral Gold Nanoclusters

“…Such methods have been shown to predict consistently accurate fluorescence energies. [52] Zero-point vibrational corrections were not included in this energetic determination, however, it was assumed to have minimal impact on the predicted fluorescence energy.…”

Photostimulated desorption of OH radicals from amorphous solid water: Evidence for the interaction of visible light with an OH-ice complex

“…Vertical excitation energies were calculated using time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT). The wB97X-D or M06-2X [47] functionals were used for the ONIOM high layer, as they have been performing well for excited-state calculations [48][49][50]. The def2-TZVP basis sets were employed.…”