2020
DOI: 10.1039/c9cp06792b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How accurate are approximate quantum chemical methods at modelling solute–solvent interactions in solvated clusters?

Abstract: In this paper, the performance of ab initio composite methods, and a wide range of DFT methods is assessed for the calculation of interaction energies of thermal clusters of a solute in water.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
(97 reference statements)
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, even when only a single conformer of a microsolvated cluster is considered, DFT was shown to be well suited to describe solute–solvent interactions, [ 100 ] supporting the added value of low-cost microsolvation approaches to approximately model (bulk) solvent effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, even when only a single conformer of a microsolvated cluster is considered, DFT was shown to be well suited to describe solute–solvent interactions, [ 100 ] supporting the added value of low-cost microsolvation approaches to approximately model (bulk) solvent effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, the impact of HTVS has been hampered by the difficulty in scaling the experimental confirmation of candidates, 1 as simulations feasible for high-throughput are still largely qualitative for condensed-phase properties. 41 A loose screen that accounts for computational inaccuracies minimizes false negatives, but the high cost of experimental validation means that almost all candidates must be rejected. The accuracy of computational screening can be maximized by implementing self-correcting filters such as checking whether simulations showed proper convergence catching false positives early on in the workflow.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common solvent for these studies, both in the production of furfural and HMF, is dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), and it is used from highly aqueous to water-free systems (Table 1). [112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128] Highly aqueous conditions (7:3 v-v water-DMSO monophasic systems), paired with microwave heating and a Lewis acid catalyst (i.e., CrCl3 or Al(NO3)3), resulted in a relatively high fructose-to-HMF selectivity (approx. 65 mol%), with a strong influence on conversion and selectivity also coming from the catalyst loading.…”
Section: Please Do Not Adjust Marginsmentioning
confidence: 99%