53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting 2015
DOI: 10.2514/6.2015-1243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hover Performance Assessment of Several Tip Shapes using OVERFLOW

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the blade anhedral acts similarly as additional negative twist on the blade loading distribution. Similar findings were reported in [16,25,66,67]. The differences in blade loading for the blades with and without anhedral are noticeably lower for the Langley Baseline blade.…”
Section: Blade Planform Shape Effectssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In fact, the blade anhedral acts similarly as additional negative twist on the blade loading distribution. Similar findings were reported in [16,25,66,67]. The differences in blade loading for the blades with and without anhedral are noticeably lower for the Langley Baseline blade.…”
Section: Blade Planform Shape Effectssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The same rotor blade was assessed using the OVERFLOW structured module of HELIOS by Narducci [20,21]. The results obtained with the structured grid method were consistent with the one performed with the unstructured grid method by…”
Section: Model-scale Rotor With Swept-tapered Tip Using the Hpcmp Cresupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Therefore, the total number of grid cells and the computational complexity of CFD simulations can become large even for a single four bladed rotor. For example, the reported computational time for two of the results compared with in this article are about 5 days on 240 cores to solve 18 rotations on a mesh of 40 M cells [10] and 5 days on 512 cores to solve 15 rotations on a mesh of 88 M cells [11]. The computational complexity of the problem can be significantly reduced for the axisymmetric hovering case by casting the equations as a steady-state problem in a noninertial reference frame and meshing only a quarter of the domain assuming periodic conditions for the flow in the azimuthal direction, solving 7.5 M cells in 24.8 h on 232 cores [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The aerodynamics of S76 rotor blades in and out of ground effect from the hover prediction workshop is investigated with the proposed NL UVLM-VPM. The results are validated with experimental data [55] and compared to various high-fidelity codes from the literature ranging from 3D URANS, 3D detached-eddy simulations (DES) to hybrid 3D URANS-VPM [10,11,[56][57][58][59][60]. Table 1 summarizes the differences in modeling between the methods used in this work and the higher fidelity URANS 3D used for results validation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%