2013
DOI: 10.1177/0042098013482502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Housing Submarkets and the Lattice of Substitution

Abstract: This paper aims to stimulate interest in the early micro-economic conceptualisation of housing submarkets proposed by Rapkin and Grigsby, which defined market areas in terms of dwelling substitutability. Three key questions need to be addressed if a return to the Rapkin-Grigsby approach is to be achievable and worthwhile. First, what are the practical benefits? (The paper highlights a range of potential research applications that would benefit from the substitutability approach.) Secondly, in what way are exis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A further extension of our method would allow for nonspatial dependence between aerial units. Pryce (2013), for example, argued that Euclidean distance or contiguity might not be the only way that dependence occurs between aerial units-perceived substitutability; social networks or communication and transport links might lead to some units being "close" even if they are spatially distant. In such circumstances, the conditional autoregressive component of the model could be constructed in substitutability or network space rather than Cartesian space (ºaszkiewicz, Dong, and Harris 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further extension of our method would allow for nonspatial dependence between aerial units. Pryce (2013), for example, argued that Euclidean distance or contiguity might not be the only way that dependence occurs between aerial units-perceived substitutability; social networks or communication and transport links might lead to some units being "close" even if they are spatially distant. In such circumstances, the conditional autoregressive component of the model could be constructed in substitutability or network space rather than Cartesian space (ºaszkiewicz, Dong, and Harris 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peng & Thibodeau, 2013;Rae, 2015). Different methods may be used to distinguish submarkets, such as statistical analyses (Bourassa, Hamelink, Hoesli, & MacGregor, 1999), methods using cross-price elasticity (Pryce, 2013), hedonic price theory (Rosen, 1974) or spatial analyses (Wu & Sharma, 2012). Previous sub-market research has focused on grouping properties to create better models with the price as dependent variable (e.g.…”
Section: Problem Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also a large literature on regressionbased estimation of house prices drawing on the 'hedonic' framework (see Adair et al, 2000;Harris, 1999; and critiques by Malpezzi, 2003 andPryce, 2013), but there are important shortcomings to this approach from a network perspective. An important difference between true statistical network analysis and techniques such as hedonic regression is the capacity to deal with dependence and connectivity (Goldenberg et al, 2010).…”
Section: Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate how the conceptual framework described above could be applied empirically, we use the CPEP estimates generated by Pryce (2013) to construct a network based on perceived substitutability in the Glasgow housing market. Estimates of CPEP are based on 33,680 geocoded GSPC (Glasgow Solicitors Property Centre) residential property transactions for the period 1999 to 2007.…”
Section: Empirical Illustrationmentioning
confidence: 99%