Milestones in European Housing Finance 2016
DOI: 10.1002/9781118929421.ch20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Housing Finance in Slovenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors Hugo Priemus and Frans Dieleman (1998) evaluated the financial prospects due to European monetary integration, and proposed solutions for improving financial policies for social housing in European Union [15]. The article by Andreja Cirman (2006) pointed out the important role of National Housing Fund in social housing development with incentive policies when borrowing for house purchase [16]. The study by Joanne Meehan (2014) highly appreciated the role of social capital sources in purchasing social housing [17].…”
Section: Foreign Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors Hugo Priemus and Frans Dieleman (1998) evaluated the financial prospects due to European monetary integration, and proposed solutions for improving financial policies for social housing in European Union [15]. The article by Andreja Cirman (2006) pointed out the important role of National Housing Fund in social housing development with incentive policies when borrowing for house purchase [16]. The study by Joanne Meehan (2014) highly appreciated the role of social capital sources in purchasing social housing [17].…”
Section: Foreign Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ko se je končala, se je delež lastniških stanovanj s 67 % leta 1991 povečal na 89 % leta 1994 oziroma za 22 % (Sendi, 2009). Drugi vladni ukrepi, ki naj bi po prehodu iz planskega gospodarstva v tržno leta 1991 povečali delež lastniških stanovanj, so vključevali ponudbo različnih predmetnih in osebnih državnih subvencij ter program stanovanjskih posojil (zgledoval se je po modelu hipotekarnega kreditiranja nemške banke Sparkasse), ki so ga uvedli leta 1991 in opustili leta 2006 (Cirman in Sendi, 2016).…”
Section: Uvodunclassified
“…By the end of the privatisation process, the share of homeownership had grown from 67% in 1991 to 89% in 1994, an increase of 22% (Sendi, 2009). Other policy measures that focused on increasing the level of homeownership following the shift from a planned to market economy in 1991 included various forms of government-sponsored object and subject subsidies and a housing loan scheme (operating on the principles of the German Sparkassen mortgage lending model), which was introduced in 1999 and abandoned in 2006 (Cirman & Sendi, 2016).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%