1995
DOI: 10.1177/0044118x95026004004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Households, Local Labor Markets, and Youth Labor Force Participation

Abstract: Drawing on studies dealing with the relationship between family and work, the authors develop a model of youth labor force participation incorporating household, local economic, and individual variables. Data are from the 1980 Public Use Microdata Sample D (PUMS-D) for 16-to 18-year-old males and females living with their parents. The findings suggest that household structural characteristics and family resources have a significant effect on youths entering the labor force. Implications of the findings are dis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we selected high schools in different cities with different student bodies, based on geographic and sociodemographic characteristics-all of which impact the types of jobs that are available to youth and the ones into which they select (Ahituv, Tienda, & Holtz, 1997;Keithly & Deseran, 1995;Rothstein, 2001;United States General Accounting Office, 1991;Usalcas, 2005). In order to adequately study work quality, we set out to attain a purposive sample that would represent a range of jobs with potentially differing work qualities.…”
Section: Sample and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we selected high schools in different cities with different student bodies, based on geographic and sociodemographic characteristics-all of which impact the types of jobs that are available to youth and the ones into which they select (Ahituv, Tienda, & Holtz, 1997;Keithly & Deseran, 1995;Rothstein, 2001;United States General Accounting Office, 1991;Usalcas, 2005). In order to adequately study work quality, we set out to attain a purposive sample that would represent a range of jobs with potentially differing work qualities.…”
Section: Sample and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of early childhood also found differences between children from poor and welfare-dependent families and children from working poor families: parental employment, despite continued low income, was associated with enhanced school readiness and lower grade retention compared with children of welfare-dependent families (Guo, Brooks-Gunn, & Harris, 1996;Zaslow & Emig, 1997). Having an employed parent was also found to be positively associated with adolescent employment (Keithly & Deseran, 1995). Parental employment status may be particularly salient for low-income adolescents who may see fewer role models of working adults and fewer opportunities for work than middle-income and affluent youth (Ogbu, 1991;Wilson, 1987).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research is increasingly recognizing that decisions about work are not made within a vacuum, but rather reflect adolescent aspirations and expectations regarding their socioeconomic futures. For example, research has shown that social class is related to patterns of work in adolescence (Keithly and Deseran 1995;Warren and Lee 2003). Low levels of employment are often observed among poorer African-American adolescents (Entwisle et al 1999;Entwisle et al 2000;Leventhal et al 2001;O'Regan and Quigley 1996); however, when those from lower SES backgrounds are able to find work, they tend to work longer hours (Staff and Mortimer 2007;Warren and Lee 2003).…”
Section: Adolescent Work Social Class and Neighborhood Disadvantagementioning
confidence: 99%