2014
DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/gru001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Household wealth trends in the United States, 1983-2010

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
129
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
129
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pfeffer, Danziger, and Schoeni (2013) document that the median household in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics lost more than 50 percent of its wealth between 2007 and 2011, and that 83 percent of that loss came from real estate. Wolff (2014) found that Housing supply shapes these wealth transfers because it partially determines the extent of a housing convulsion. Glaeser, Gyourko, and Saiz (2008) show that the 1980s housing boom and subsequent bust largely bypassed places with elastic housing supply.…”
Section: The Impact Of Supply Restrictions: Household Wealthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pfeffer, Danziger, and Schoeni (2013) document that the median household in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics lost more than 50 percent of its wealth between 2007 and 2011, and that 83 percent of that loss came from real estate. Wolff (2014) found that Housing supply shapes these wealth transfers because it partially determines the extent of a housing convulsion. Glaeser, Gyourko, and Saiz (2008) show that the 1980s housing boom and subsequent bust largely bypassed places with elastic housing supply.…”
Section: The Impact Of Supply Restrictions: Household Wealthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work (see Wolff, 1987Wolff, , 1994Wolff, , 1998Wolff, , 2002Wolff, , and 2011, using the SCF, presented evidence of sharply increasing household wealth inequality between 1983 and 1989 followed by …”
Section: Background On Wealth Trendsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…California, where labor has benefitted from a "powerful mix of the awakening militancy among the mushrooming low-wage, largely immigrant workforce, the growing political strength of labor in local and state elected bodies, and the use of that political clout to improve the climate for organizing" provides perhaps the best-case scenario (Zabin, At the heart of emerging institutional change is the traditional radical principle that the ownership of capital should be subject to democratic control. In a nation where one percent of the population owns more investment wealth than the remaining 99 percent (51.5 percent of total), this principle is likely to be particularly appealing to the young-the people who will shape the next political era (Wolff, 2014). Civil Rights, feminist, and other great movements.…”
Section: Evolutionary Reconstruction In the Era Of Growing Painmentioning
confidence: 99%