1996
DOI: 10.1093/wbro/11.1.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Household Responses to Public Health Services: Cost and Quality Tradeoffs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It would be surprising if such charges did not deter demand. The evidence confirms that they do 9 . There is some difference in the estimated strength of the relationship.…”
Section: Constraints On the Demand For Health Caresupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It would be surprising if such charges did not deter demand. The evidence confirms that they do 9 . There is some difference in the estimated strength of the relationship.…”
Section: Constraints On the Demand For Health Caresupporting
confidence: 63%
“…There is strong empirical support for the proposition that the poor are more price sensitive than the better off 9,38,41,42 . Increases in user charges will raise the share of health care consumed by the better off, unless effective mechanisms are implemented to shield the poor from these charges.…”
Section: Constraints On the Demand For Health Carementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This determinant is concerned with which type of health facility is more available to prospective users. This would include the level of expertise and treatment that could be assumed from the type of facility, that is a hospital versus a dispensary, or if public facilities are limited and not accessible, so private facilities have filled the gap, as is the case in Vietnam [16], [17], or Uganda [18], [19], or India [20], [21].…”
Section: Source: Moms 2011; District Strategic Plans 2005-2010mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In doing so, the article contributes to the thin literature on the effects on household behavior and outcomes in developing economies of quality improvements in health facilities (Alderman and Lavy 1996, Hotchkiss 1998, Lavy and others 1996, education facilities (Glewwe 1999, Hanushek 1995, Kremer 1995, and water and sanitation facilities (Brockerhoff andDerose 1996, Lee andothers 1997). Existing studies are based on cross-sectional variations in quality and do not take account of the endogeneity of the placement of government investments.…”
Section: Menno Pradhan and Laura B Rawlingsmentioning
confidence: 99%