2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Household fuels, low birth weight, and neonatal death in India: The separate impacts of biomass, kerosene, and coal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
117
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
19
117
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Low birth weight is one of the most important factors associated with the NMR in different parts of the world (4,22,23), as well as different areas of Iran (24)(25)(26). The current study results also showed that low birth weight (less than 2500 g) increases the risk of death in the neonates by 32.6-fold.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Low birth weight is one of the most important factors associated with the NMR in different parts of the world (4,22,23), as well as different areas of Iran (24)(25)(26). The current study results also showed that low birth weight (less than 2500 g) increases the risk of death in the neonates by 32.6-fold.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…21,[27][28][29] Being the firstborn child was protective for child mortality while it was a risk factor for neonatal mortality in our study. Urban versus rural status was not predictive of mortality for either age group.…”
Section: Disclaimer Statementssupporting
confidence: 47%
“…21 In adjusted models, there were significant associations between exposure to kerosene and coal with neonatal mortality but there was not an association between exposure to biomass and neonatal mortality. As discussed previously, it is likely that the effect of solid fuels on mortality in the current study is driven by wood smoke, but since we did not separate the effects of the solid fuel group we cannot comment on whether our results confirm or contradict Epstein's findings on biomass and coal.…”
Section: Disclaimer Statementsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because an SHS has a minimal installed carbon footprint and solar energy is in almost inexhaustible supply in the foreseeable future, SHSs are likely to have more positive environmental impacts than fossil and biomass fuels. An SHS can replace kerosene lamps, which emit substantial amounts of fine particulates, carbon monoxide (CO), nitric oxides (NO x ), and sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), all of which adversely effects indoor air quality [29]. These pollutants may cause impair lung function and increase infectious illness (including tuberculosis), asthma, and cancer risks [21].…”
Section: Health and Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%