2020
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Household coverage, quality and costs of care provided by community health worker teams and the determining factors: findings from a mixed methods study in South Africa

Abstract: ObjectiveCommunity health workers (CHWs) are undertaking more complex tasks as part of the move towards universal health coverage in South Africa. CHW programmes can improve access to care for vulnerable communities, but many such programmes struggle with insufficient supervision. In this paper, we assess coverage (proportion of households visited by a CHW in the past year and month), quality of care and costs of the service provided by CHW teams with differing configurations of supervisors, some based in form… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(21 reference statements)
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interview guides and observation templates (see online supplemental material ) were revised after piloting and feedback from the FWs. 36 FWs (none of whom were from the community), introduced themselves to participants as working for the study under the University of the Witwatersrand. Interviews were 15–60 min and focus group discussions (FGDs) 60–90 min in duration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interview guides and observation templates (see online supplemental material ) were revised after piloting and feedback from the FWs. 36 FWs (none of whom were from the community), introduced themselves to participants as working for the study under the University of the Witwatersrand. Interviews were 15–60 min and focus group discussions (FGDs) 60–90 min in duration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our situation analysis showed the programme was under-resources, and when a CHW team was led by a junior nurse, there was insu cient supervision, and the programme was often under-resourced and poorly integrated into healthcare system and community structures (9). This resulted in poor quality of care and low household coverage (18). In contrast, teams led by an experienced nurse were well integrated in the healthcare system, had access to equipment and CHWs received supportive supervision (9).…”
Section: Our Initial Programme Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each CHW was expected to register new households to identify individuals or families in need of care. Prior to the intervention, the registration of households was low with only 20% households in both sites ever having been visited by a CHW (18). Moreover, CHW asked less than half of the nine household registration questions, partly due di culties in understanding the questions as they are written in English, or the purpose of the questions.…”
Section: Prior To Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the CHWs provided care to a greater range of people and performed a greater range of more complex tasks. For further papers on the situational analysis see [ 9 , 18 ], and tool development see [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%