2014
DOI: 10.1111/1540-6229.12062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

House Prices and Rents: Microevidence from a Matched Data Set in Central London

Abstract: Using the proprietary dataset of a real estate agency, I analyse tens of thousands of housing sale and rental transactions in Central London during the 2005-2011 period. I run hedonic regressions on both prices and rents and show that price-rent ratios are higher for bigger and more central units. Since this result could be driven by differences in unobserved characteristics between properties for sale and properties for rent, I replicate my analysis using only units that were both sold and rented out within 6… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
52
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the other end of the spectrum, the discount rate on very short leases can be compared to the average rent‐price ratio in the area, given some degree of substitutability between renting for a few years and buying a short lease. Bracke () measures rent‐price ratios in 2006–12 in the same PCL area and finds a median rent‐price ratio of 5%, consistent with discount rates of 4–7% seen for very short leases in the 2004–13 sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…At the other end of the spectrum, the discount rate on very short leases can be compared to the average rent‐price ratio in the area, given some degree of substitutability between renting for a few years and buying a short lease. Bracke () measures rent‐price ratios in 2006–12 in the same PCL area and finds a median rent‐price ratio of 5%, consistent with discount rates of 4–7% seen for very short leases in the 2004–13 sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The biased estimates imply that homeownership rates are increasing in the predicted price of a home even though the predicted rent-to-price ratio declines in the price of the home. This is a common finding: Verbrugge (2008); Heston and Nakamura (2009);Verbrugge and Poole (2010);Bracke (2013); Epple et al (2013) all find that rent-to-price ratios decline with prices while, similarly, Landvoigt et al (Forthcoming) estimates that housing service flows rise less than one-for-one with property prices in the cross-section. 20 The relationships shown in Figure 12 and in these studies are puzzling from a certain angle and are a challenge for models which attempt to explain the distribution of household homeownership choices: why do so many households choose to buy expensive properties when seemingly equivalent rental properties are relatively cheap?…”
Section: Bias In Imputed Rents And/or Pricesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, the rescaling does play an important role in the analysis of user costs, yields, and contracting costs in Section 5.4. For these parts of the analysis, we estimate ω 33 by fitting the predicted rental sector yields from the model to data on rental sector yields in Bracke (2015). We discuss this further in Section 5.4.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This differential is broadly consistent with what others have found. Both Bracke (2013), for a matched sample of London homes, and Hill and Syed (2012), for Sydney, find lower yields for houses than apartments. Bracke (2013) finds that the rental yield for houses is around half a percent lower than for apartments.…”
Section: Insert Figures 4 5 and 6 Herementioning
confidence: 93%