2022
DOI: 10.1108/jerer-02-2022-0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

House price dynamics in Iberian Metropolitan Statistical Areas: slope heterogeneity, cross-sectional dependence and elasticities

Abstract: PurposeThis paper studies the dynamics and elasticities of house prices in Spain and Portugal (Iberia) at the Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) level, addressing panel regression problems such as heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence between MSA.Design/methodology/approachThe authors develop a two steps study. First, five distinct estimation methodologies are applied to estimate the long-term house price equilibrium of the Iberian MSA house market: Mean Group (MG), Fully Modified Ordinary Least Square… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(123 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper is close to Oikarinen et al (2018) and Cunha and Lobão (2022) in objectives and partly in methodology. All the studies are multicity multivariate panel spatial analyses.…”
Section: House Price Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This paper is close to Oikarinen et al (2018) and Cunha and Lobão (2022) in objectives and partly in methodology. All the studies are multicity multivariate panel spatial analyses.…”
Section: House Price Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Corresponding estimates for construction costs is 0.07. The income elasticities of demand reported by other studies is as follows: Holly et al (2010) in the USA (1.14), Matysiak and Olszewski (2019) in Warsaw market as (−0.894), Cunha and Lobão (2022) estimate the long-run coefficient as (0.227) in Iberian cities. The mean coefficient for the 14 cities with positive parameters is 0.36, and the remaining 21 cities with negative sign for, the coefficient is 0.41.…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations