1987
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.4.000945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hotelling trace criterion and its correlation with human-observer performance

Abstract: The Hotelling trace criterion (HTC) is used to find a set of linear features that optimally separate two classes of objects. The objects used in our study were simulated livers with and without tumors, with noise, blur, and object variability. Using the receiver-operating-characteristic parameter da as our measure, we have found that the ability of the HTC to separate these objects into their correct classes, by detecting the presence or absence of a tumor, has a correlation of 0.988 with the ability of humans… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
79
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expression for t Hot (g | r p ) in Eq. (16), which requires the knowledge of the mean vectors and covariance matrix under the two hypotheses, is the socalled Hotelling observer [1,7,15,34,35] and is a linear function of g. As pointed out in [36], the Hotelling observer is still analytically tractable in realistic cases (for example, when the background can be described by a stationary random process), whereas computing the likelihood ratio in practical cases is, in general, a difficult problem. The derivation above shows that, if the data are normally distributed, the Hotelling observer is equivalent to the likelihood ratio, in the sense that they differ by an additive or positive multiplicative constant.…”
Section: Hotelling and Ideal Observers In Adaptive Opticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expression for t Hot (g | r p ) in Eq. (16), which requires the knowledge of the mean vectors and covariance matrix under the two hypotheses, is the socalled Hotelling observer [1,7,15,34,35] and is a linear function of g. As pointed out in [36], the Hotelling observer is still analytically tractable in realistic cases (for example, when the background can be described by a stationary random process), whereas computing the likelihood ratio in practical cases is, in general, a difficult problem. The derivation above shows that, if the data are normally distributed, the Hotelling observer is equivalent to the likelihood ratio, in the sense that they differ by an additive or positive multiplicative constant.…”
Section: Hotelling and Ideal Observers In Adaptive Opticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for using BMI instead of partial patient weight is a practical one: when deciding whether to perform 2D or 3D imaging, one needs to know before starting the scan what protocol to use, and one cannot compute the sum of LACs before scanning the patient but can easily compute the patient BMI. The task considered in this work was lesion detection, measured by SNR CHO (15,19,20). Although lesion detection performance is best assessed using human observer studies (e.g., receiver operating (5)), the numeric observer approach allows more rapid assessment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common recourse is then the ideal linear or Hotelling observer, [10][11][12] for which the test statistic is the linear discriminant that maximizes the SNR defined in (4.1). This optimal linear discriminant is given by (4.5) where the superscript t denotes transpose, the angle brackets denote averages over all sources of randomness (background object, signal to be detected, system and measurement noise) and Δ〈gâŒȘ ≡ 〈gâŒȘ 1 − 〈gâŒȘ 0 is the difference between the mean data vectors under the two hypotheses.…”
Section: Ideal and Ideal-linear Observers For Binary Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%