2019
DOI: 10.1177/1532440019842175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hot Districts, Cool Legislation: Evaluating Agenda Setting in Climate Change Bill Sponsorship in U.S. States

Abstract: What factors influence agenda setting behavior in state legislatures in the United States? Using the localized effects of climate change, we examine whether notable changes in temperature can raise the salience of the issue, thus encouraging a legislative response. To evaluate the behavior of individual legislators around climate policy, we utilize an original data set that includes geographic mapping of climate anomalies at the state legislative district level and incorporates individual, chamber, district, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In regard to government policy, several studies document that Republican‐dominated governments are less likely to adopt or initiate policies consistent with environmental protection (see Adua, 2021; Bromley‐Trujillo et al, 2016; Bromley‐Trujillo, Holman, & Sandoval, 2019; Carley, 2011; Chandler, 2009; Coley & Hess, 2012; Fowler & Breen, 2013; Gerber, 2013; Huang et al, 2007; Lester, 1980; Lim & Bowen, 2018; Lyon & Yin, 2010). Huang et al (2007), for instance, report that states dominated by the Republican Party are significantly less likely to adopt renewable energy portfolio standards than those dominated by the Democratic Party.…”
Section: The Political Partisanship Explanation Of Commitment To Envimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In regard to government policy, several studies document that Republican‐dominated governments are less likely to adopt or initiate policies consistent with environmental protection (see Adua, 2021; Bromley‐Trujillo et al, 2016; Bromley‐Trujillo, Holman, & Sandoval, 2019; Carley, 2011; Chandler, 2009; Coley & Hess, 2012; Fowler & Breen, 2013; Gerber, 2013; Huang et al, 2007; Lester, 1980; Lim & Bowen, 2018; Lyon & Yin, 2010). Huang et al (2007), for instance, report that states dominated by the Republican Party are significantly less likely to adopt renewable energy portfolio standards than those dominated by the Democratic Party.…”
Section: The Political Partisanship Explanation Of Commitment To Envimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also evidence of higher support for clean energy laws among Democrats than Republicans (Coley & Hess, 2012). In relation to policy initiation, Bromley‐Trujillo and her collaborators (2019) report that Democratic members of state legislatures are more likely to initiate climate change policies in general and in response to temperature anomalies than are their Republican counterparts. In fact, these authors report that Republicans are altogether unresponsive to temperature anomalies consistent with climate change.…”
Section: The Political Partisanship Explanation Of Commitment To Envimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through the passage and implementation of relevant policies and practices, pro-environmental voting records in states' Congressional delegations contribute to reductions in greenhouse emissions (Dietz et al 2015). In addition, Democrats in state legislatures have responded to temperature anomalies by sponsoring more climate change bills, while Republicans are unresponsive to climate anomalies (Bromley-Trujillo, Holman, and Sandoval 2019).…”
Section: Partisanshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Overall, the largest group of articles in the data set focused on politics, with 81 articles falling in this category. Articles in this category address such disparate topics as political control of the bureaucracy (e.g., Beland & Boucher, 2015;Potoski & Woods, 2001;Waterman, Rouse, & Wright, 1998), legislative politics (e.g., Bromley-Trujillo, Holman, & Sandoval, 2019;Brunell & Cease, 2019); public opinion (e.g., Fowler, 2016;Johnson, Brace, & Arceneaux, 2005;Kim & Urpelainen, 2018), environmental interest groups and protest movements (e.g., Crow et al, 2019;Muñoz, Olzak, & Soule, 2018;Reenock & Gerber, 2008), and environmental justice (e.g., Konisky & Reenock, 2017;Liang, 2018;Wikstrom, Miller, Campbell, & Tschudi, 2019). The latter has been a particular focus in recent years, contributing to the sharp upward trajectory of this category since 2014.…”
Section: Areas Of Theoretical Concernmentioning
confidence: 99%