2012
DOI: 10.1007/s13632-012-0052-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hot Deformation Behavior of Ti–6Al–4V Alloy in β Phase Field and Low Strain Rate

Abstract: Hot deformation of Ti-6Al-4V alloy in b phase field is studied by means of compression testing at different temperatures and strains. Microstructural observations indicate that dynamic recrystallization of b grains occurs in the designated experimental conditions. Dynamic recrystallization was analyzed on the basis of the JMAK kinetics equation and strain hardening rate versus stress curves. The apparent activation energy for hot deformation was calculated as 168.5 kJ/mol. The variation of dynamically recrysta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some processing map studies, a barreling correction is applied to the results to account for the sample shape change during deformation and the development of triaxiality. 42,44,45 However, these corrections are insufficient since as the FE simulations show the link between the macroscopic nominal stress-strain curve and the actual stressstrain behavior of the material is not so simple. In each test, the macroscopic sample response is an average of the material behavior over all the different conditions in the sample.…”
Section: Strain-rate Sensitivity Processing Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some processing map studies, a barreling correction is applied to the results to account for the sample shape change during deformation and the development of triaxiality. 42,44,45 However, these corrections are insufficient since as the FE simulations show the link between the macroscopic nominal stress-strain curve and the actual stressstrain behavior of the material is not so simple. In each test, the macroscopic sample response is an average of the material behavior over all the different conditions in the sample.…”
Section: Strain-rate Sensitivity Processing Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there has been very little work published in relation to the computational modelling for the material microstructural evolution during IN718 LFW. Computational modelling studies about DRX processes have been published for steel, aluminium alloys, and titanium alloys during hot forging or hot isothermal compression testing processes [30,[46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. While these studies have used renowned models such as the Johnson-Mehl-Avrami-Kolmogorov (JMAK) model and the cellular automaton model, they have not been implemented for modelling of DRX of γ grains during LFW of IN718 (or any nickel-based superalloy) [30,46,51,53,54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, dynamic recovery was inferred from the steady state of the flow stress combined with low values of the strain rate sensitivity [8][9][10]. Discontinuous dynamic recrystallization (dDRX) was reported mostly after metallographic observations in samples of Ti-6Al-4V after deformation followed by uncontrolled cooling rate (e.g., [11][12][13]). A study in a near β titanium alloy combined water quenching immediately after hot compression with electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) characterization to reveal that dominant mechanisms of the β-phase deformation were dynamic recovery (DRV) followed by continuous dynamic recrystallization (cDRX) [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%