2012
DOI: 10.1109/jphotov.2012.2207376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hot Carrier Solar Cells: Controlling Thermalization in Ultrathin Devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency enhancement achieved in a device with Q = 2.5 W · K −1 · cm −2 , relative to a thermal equilibrium equivalent device (Q → ∞) is significant for field enhancement factors >1000X. This level of field enhancement has been demonstrated with external solar focusing modules [33], [34]; however, future devices might also employ device integrated nanostructures to achieve the required fields [35], [36].…”
Section: Projected Efficiency Enhancementmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The efficiency enhancement achieved in a device with Q = 2.5 W · K −1 · cm −2 , relative to a thermal equilibrium equivalent device (Q → ∞) is significant for field enhancement factors >1000X. This level of field enhancement has been demonstrated with external solar focusing modules [33], [34]; however, future devices might also employ device integrated nanostructures to achieve the required fields [35], [36].…”
Section: Projected Efficiency Enhancementmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although quantum confinement certainly plays a role, part of this reduction can purely be ascribed to having a thinner absorber. This is because the number of LO phonon decay channels scales with the absorber volume 23 . Other identified thermalization mechanisms include Auger effect 24 , although it is significant only for carrier concentrations above 10 19 cm −3 in GaAs 25 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today we find a plethora of promising research on the development and characterisation of hot carrier absorber [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. However, the optical methods used to obtain carrier temperature can be inaccurate when dealing with nanostructures and high excitation fluxes [23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%