2021
DOI: 10.5210/fm.v26i3.11547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hostility online: Flaming, trolling, and the public debate

Abstract: Whereas the amount of hostility found online increases, scholarly interest in online hostility is decreasing. In this paper, I discuss three questions central to the study of online hostility, namely 1) what role the text, the speaker’s intention and the targets’ perception should play in definitions of hostility; 2) whether hostility is always destructive or if it can also be productive in public debate; and 3) how to distinguish between destructive and productive hostility. I demonstrate the difficulties in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…pineapple on pizza). In this way, hostility has become a part of a 'rhetorical culture' where a hostile yet playful tone of irony and detached laughter is not only tolerated but expected (Andersen, 2021). Thus, future research should aim to provide more accurate conceptual definitions that are adapted specifically to online communication and include more systematic comparisons across platforms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pineapple on pizza). In this way, hostility has become a part of a 'rhetorical culture' where a hostile yet playful tone of irony and detached laughter is not only tolerated but expected (Andersen, 2021). Thus, future research should aim to provide more accurate conceptual definitions that are adapted specifically to online communication and include more systematic comparisons across platforms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Can be openly misogynous in nature and is often targeted at women with threats and/or fantasies of sexual violence or incitement to sexual violence (Andersen, 2021).…”
Section: Flamingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All four must be clearly distinguished from impoliteness, online incivility, offensive, derogatory, and abusive language, or so-called "flaming." The latter depict forms of discursive hostility (Andersen, 2021), or hostile ways of presenting content-not the behavior itself. Accordingly, uncivil language could be used in connection with all forms of online hostility, albeit for different purposes and with different intentions.…”
Section: Definition Of Trollingmentioning
confidence: 99%