2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hostility and facial affect recognition: Effects of a cold pressor stressor on accuracy and cardiovascular reactivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, research has shown the induction of anger can negatively impact latency and accuracy on measures of facial affect recognition (Harrison and Gorelczenko 1990;McKeever and Dixon 1981;Reuter-Lorenz et al 1983;Suberi and McKeever 1977). Extending this line of research, Herridge et al (2004) found that these latency and accuracy effects can be shown to be greater for individuals scoring higher on the Cook-Medley Hostility Inventory (CMHI; Cook and Medley 1954) than those scoring in the lower range. Utilizing a go/no go paradigm, Maxwell et al (2005) examined the effects of emotionally valenced faces on inhibitory processes.…”
Section: Visual Modalitymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For example, research has shown the induction of anger can negatively impact latency and accuracy on measures of facial affect recognition (Harrison and Gorelczenko 1990;McKeever and Dixon 1981;Reuter-Lorenz et al 1983;Suberi and McKeever 1977). Extending this line of research, Herridge et al (2004) found that these latency and accuracy effects can be shown to be greater for individuals scoring higher on the Cook-Medley Hostility Inventory (CMHI; Cook and Medley 1954) than those scoring in the lower range. Utilizing a go/no go paradigm, Maxwell et al (2005) examined the effects of emotionally valenced faces on inhibitory processes.…”
Section: Visual Modalitymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This integration may account for the wide range of cognitive, behavioral, and physiological changes that occur as a result of emotion and/or pain. As mentioned above, critical factors in brain organization include divisions between the frontal lobes and the posterior brain, as well as divisions between the left and 1998Daum et al, 1995Borod, Haywood, & Koff, 1997Wildgruber et al, 2004Inhibition Shenal et al, 2003Yamaguchi & Knight, 1990Heller, 1993Davis et al, 1994Thayer & Friedman, 2002Talbot et al, 1995Rule et al, 2002Lorenz et al, 2003Valence Evaluation Heilman, 1997Fulbright et al, 2001Herridge et al, 2004Motor Response Davidson, 1993Tamura et al, 2004Wunsch et al, 2003Left Frontal Expression Wildgruber et al, 2004Daum et al, 1995Inhibition Thayer & Friedman, 2002Yamaguchi & Knight, 1990Rule et al, 2002Davis et al, 1994Talbot et al, 1995Lorenz et al, 2003Valence Evaluation Heilman, 1997Fulbright et al, 2001Bassel & Schiff, 2001Motor Response Harmon-Jones & Allen, 19971998Wunsch et al, 2003Harmon-Jones & Sigelman, 2001Harmon-Jones, 2004a2004bRight Posterior Perception Heilman, 1997Treede et al, 1999Heilman & Gilmore...…”
Section: Emotion and Pain: Integration Of Functional Cerebral Systemsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These functions can further be divided between the right and left frontal lobe. It is generally found that the right frontal lobe plays a role in expression of emotional prosody (Heilman & Gilmore, 1998;Heilman et al, 2004;Wildgruber et al, 2002), expression of pain related behavior (Daum, Braun, Riesch, Miltner, Ackermann, et al, 1995), inhibition (Yamaguchi & Knight, 1990), Bartolic et al, 1999Seltzer & Yarczower, 1991Miller et al, 1995Motor Borod, et al, 1997Dimberg & Petterson, 2000Demaree et al, 2002Everhart et al, 2002Auditory Bryden, et al, 1982Bryden & MacRae, 1989Bruder et al, 1989Gadea et al, 1995Visual Reuter-Lorenz et al, 1983Weisenberg et al, 1998Harrison & Gorelczencko, 1990Meagher et al, 2001Herridge et al, 2004Herridge et al, 2004Somatosensory Lee et al, 2002Chandramouth et al, 1993Herridge et al, 1997Schiff & Gagliese, 1994Pauli et al, 1999Lugo et al, 2002Ozcan et al, 2004Physiological Lee et al, 2002Avon et al, 2004Lesion Study Borod et al, 2002Burton & Labar, 1999Adolphs et al, 1996EEG Heller et al, 1990Ferracuti et al, 1994Davidson, 1995, 1998…”
Section: Right and Left Frontal Functionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This work lends itself to suggest that the right hemisphere maintains an excitatory role over the reticular activating system, and the left hemisphere possibly portrays an inhibitory role over the right hemisphere or the reticular activating system (Heilman, Support for the Right Hemisphere Model has grown to include right hemisphere dominance during emotional provocation (Borod, Vingiano, & Cytryn, 1988;Tucker, Roth, Arneson, & Buckingham, 1977) and in the comprehension and expression of emotional prosodic speech (Borod, Andelman, Obler, Tweedy, & Welkowitz, 1992;Borod et al, 1998, Borod, Bloom, Brickman, Nakhutina, & Curko, 2002Bowers, Coslett, Bauer, Speedie, & Heilman, 1987;Emerson, Harrison, & Everhart, 1999;Heilman, Scholes, and Watson, 1975;Schmitt, Hartje, & Willmes, 1997). Additionally, there is evidence for right hemisphere specialization in the perception of negative emotional faces (Herridge, Harrison, Mollet, & Shenal, 2004;Mandel, Tandon, & Asthana, 1991;Wittling & Roschmann, 1993) and in the expression of emotional facial gestures (Borod, Haywood, & Koff, 1997;Herridge, Harrison, & Demaree, 1997;Rhodes, Hu, & Harrison, 2000).…”
Section: -Right Hemisphere Model Of Emotionmentioning
confidence: 99%