Chemical Ecology of Insects 2 1995
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-1765-8_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Host-Tree Chemistry Affecting Colonization in Bark Beetles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
128
0
7

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 268 publications
1
128
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of the key decisions that bark beetles must make during the process of host selection (Borden, 1997;Schlyter & Birgersson, 1999) reveals that the following negative signals may be exploited in potential tactics for control of conifer bark beetles: (i) volatiles indicating the unsuitable host trees, such as verbenone (Vn) from host trees fully colonized by conspecific species, 4-allylanisole and monoterpenes from resistant hosts (Hayne et al, 1994;Byers et al, 2000;Erbilgin & Raffa, 2000), and other synomones from heterospecific bark beetles (Byers, 1995;Borden, 1997); (ii) specific bark volatiles signalling the nonhost angiosperm species (Borden et al, 1998;Schlyter & Birgersson, 1999;Huber, 2001;; or (iii) common green leaf volatiles (GLVs), especially the C 6 -alcohols emitted at high levels from leaves (and to a less extent from bark) of angiosperm trees/plants representing the nonhost habitats (Dickens et al, 1991(Dickens et al, , 1992aHuber, 2001;). Due to the inconsistent effects of Vn and 4-allylanisole, and the expensiveness of heterospecific synomones (Borden, 1997), recent studies have focused on inexpensive GLVs and other nonhost volatiles (NHVs) from the intact angiosperm trees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of the key decisions that bark beetles must make during the process of host selection (Borden, 1997;Schlyter & Birgersson, 1999) reveals that the following negative signals may be exploited in potential tactics for control of conifer bark beetles: (i) volatiles indicating the unsuitable host trees, such as verbenone (Vn) from host trees fully colonized by conspecific species, 4-allylanisole and monoterpenes from resistant hosts (Hayne et al, 1994;Byers et al, 2000;Erbilgin & Raffa, 2000), and other synomones from heterospecific bark beetles (Byers, 1995;Borden, 1997); (ii) specific bark volatiles signalling the nonhost angiosperm species (Borden et al, 1998;Schlyter & Birgersson, 1999;Huber, 2001;; or (iii) common green leaf volatiles (GLVs), especially the C 6 -alcohols emitted at high levels from leaves (and to a less extent from bark) of angiosperm trees/plants representing the nonhost habitats (Dickens et al, 1991(Dickens et al, , 1992aHuber, 2001;). Due to the inconsistent effects of Vn and 4-allylanisole, and the expensiveness of heterospecific synomones (Borden, 1997), recent studies have focused on inexpensive GLVs and other nonhost volatiles (NHVs) from the intact angiosperm trees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T. piniperda is strongly attracted by the host monoterpenes released through an injury on the tree or through the holes made by the pioneer beetles in the trunk. This can in fact induce a mass attack comparable to that induced by the aggregation pheromones in other species (Lå ngström et al, 1992;Byers, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The sensitivity towards different kinds of monoterpenes differs within populations of bark beetles, depending on whether the composition of the terpenes represents their respective host trees or not (Byers, 1995). T. piniperda is strongly attracted by the host monoterpenes released through an injury on the tree or through the holes made by the pioneer beetles in the trunk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that each species of tree has coevolved chemicals to defend against the selection pressures of bark beetles and other insects (Berryman et al, 1985;Byers, 1995). Plant chemicals can be attractive, repellent, toxic or nutritious to bark beetles and have effects on: (1) finding and accepting the host tree (selection and suitability); (2) feeding stimulation and deterrence; (3) host resistance; (4) pheromone biosynthesis and communication; and (5) attraction of predators, parasites and competitors of bark beetles (Byers, 2004).…”
Section: Chemical Ecology Of the Host Tree Colonization By Bark Beetlmentioning
confidence: 99%