1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00350870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Host selection, location, and association behaviors of anemonefishes in field settlement experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
122
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
122
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the suitability of a given microhabitat can be context specific, such as when a fish inhabits a particular microhabitat only when it occurs in a particular reef area (e.g. Elliott et al 1995). Accordingly, broad habitat choice patterns within a guild remained even at a global scale, although changes in the host-coral spectrum occurred and superior competitors became more generalised when fishes adapted to the Red Sea environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the suitability of a given microhabitat can be context specific, such as when a fish inhabits a particular microhabitat only when it occurs in a particular reef area (e.g. Elliott et al 1995). Accordingly, broad habitat choice patterns within a guild remained even at a global scale, although changes in the host-coral spectrum occurred and superior competitors became more generalised when fishes adapted to the Red Sea environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the probability of a fish larva reaching a reef may not be proportional to reef area. Nonrandom recruitment of juveniles to a habitat patch has been reported for some coral reef fish species (Elliott et al 1995;Schmitt and Holbrook 1999;Hattori 2012). For example, residents chase newly settled juveniles of Dascyllus species out of the branching corals and sea anemones they inhabit when shelter space is insufficient (Schmitt and Holbrook 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, both Gerlach et al (2007) and Dixson et al (2008) have shown that settlement-stage coral reef fish larvae are capable of discriminating between different reefs on the basis of water-borne chemical cues. Settling larvae have been shown to respond to a variety of olfactory signals, such as those from coral tissue and conspecifics (Lecchini et al 2005a(Lecchini et al , 2005b, or symbiotic partners (Elliott et al 1995;Arvedlund and Nielsen 1996;Arvedlund et al 1999). There is further evidence that settling larvae can discriminate between different reefs without any prior experience (Elliott et al 1995;Arvedlund and Takemura 2006;Dixson et al 2008), although early larval experiences may also influence habitat selection choices at settlement stage (Arvedlund and Nielsen 1996;Miller-Sims et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Settling larvae have been shown to respond to a variety of olfactory signals, such as those from coral tissue and conspecifics (Lecchini et al 2005a(Lecchini et al , 2005b, or symbiotic partners (Elliott et al 1995;Arvedlund and Nielsen 1996;Arvedlund et al 1999). There is further evidence that settling larvae can discriminate between different reefs without any prior experience (Elliott et al 1995;Arvedlund and Takemura 2006;Dixson et al 2008), although early larval experiences may also influence habitat selection choices at settlement stage (Arvedlund and Nielsen 1996;Miller-Sims et al 2011). Despite the considerable research that has been conducted on larval settlement cues over the past decade, the use of olfactory cues for habitat selection has only been investigated for coral-reef fishes, and we are unaware of any published research on the use of olfactory cues for settlement in marine, temperate fish species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%