1975
DOI: 10.1093/ee/4.5.687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Host Resistance to Diatraea saccharalis (F.): 1 Relationship of Sugarcane Internode Hardness to Larval Damage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Martin et al. () and Keeping & Rutherford () showed that sugarcane internode rind hardness is a source of larval antibiosis for the stem borers D. saccharalis and Eldana saccharina Walker. Stem fiber and relative lignin contents may also affect larval feeding and development (Rutherford et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Martin et al. () and Keeping & Rutherford () showed that sugarcane internode rind hardness is a source of larval antibiosis for the stem borers D. saccharalis and Eldana saccharina Walker. Stem fiber and relative lignin contents may also affect larval feeding and development (Rutherford et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although more larvae became established feeding on the leaves and sheaths of mature sugarcane plants, proportionately fewer successfully entered the stalk relative to immature sugarcane possibly because immature sugarcane plants have greater nutritional value than mature sugarcane plants (ReayÐJones et al 2007b). Further, the longer exposure on mature sugarcane plants suggests that physiological factors, such as increased rind hardness (Martin et al 1975), of mature sugarcane impedes stalk boring (Van Leerdam 1986, Ring et al 1991. Similarly, D. saccharalis establishment on corn plant surfaces infested at later growth stages is greater than on younger corn attributable to decreased leaf sheath appression as plants age, while larval stalk entry was greater on younger corn (Flynn et al 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toughness of plant tissue is increased by thick, lignified tissues which render them more resistant to the tearing or chewing action of insect mandibles and more difficult to digest (Norris and Kogan, 1980;Wallace et al, 1973;Howe, 1949;Agarwal, 1969;Martin et al, 1975). The route taken by M. testulalis larvae in stem has not been described, but the preferred and most convenient route in the ground tissue is likely to be intercellular rather than intracellular, or a combination of both routes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%