1974
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.4.5939.268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Host Resistance in Relation to Survival in Breast Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
3

Year Published

1974
1974
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A relationship between host defense mechanisms and prognosis of breast cancer has been discussed for decades (24). In a pioneering study, Aaltomaa and colleagues (19) showed that lymphocytic infiltrates were related to a good outcome in breast cancer, especially in rapidly proliferating tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relationship between host defense mechanisms and prognosis of breast cancer has been discussed for decades (24). In a pioneering study, Aaltomaa and colleagues (19) showed that lymphocytic infiltrates were related to a good outcome in breast cancer, especially in rapidly proliferating tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been possible to enumerate and characterise host cell infiltrates in a number of tumour systems, including melanoma and breast, lung, and gastrointestinal tumours (Gauci and Alexander, 1975;Husby et al, 1976;Ioachim et al, 1976;Lauder et al, 1977). In several turnout types the degree of infiltration has been shown to have a prognostic value (Hamlin, 1968;Bloom et al, 1970;E1-ston and Bagshawe, 1973;Di Paola et al, 1974, 1977Lauder et al, 1977). The implication of such studies is that these features represent an immunological response to the tumour with attraction of reactive cells to the antigenic site, as found in allograft rejection (Tilney and Ford, 1974).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Good prognosis Sistrunk and MacCarty [3] 91 8 Moore and Foote [4] 1000 (449) 5 Richardson [5] 1660 (117) 10 Berg [6] 100 10 Hamlin [7] 272 15 Cutler et al [8] 879 (111) 10 Bloom et al [9] 1411 (104) 20 Ridolfi et al [10] 443 10 DiPaola et al [11] 310 5…”
Section: Authormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No correlation Griffith et al [12] 77 3 Elston et al [13] 1562 10 Bad prognosis Leitch [14] 5 Months Schumann [15] 11 Months Learmonth [16] 46 5 Lee and Tannenbaum [17] 28 5 Pfahler and Case [18] 15 5 Taylor and Meltzer [19] 38 2 Droulias et al [20] 75 18 Lucas and Perez-Mesa [21] 58 5 Mourali et al [22] 145 NA Levine et al [23] 134 (42) NA Costa et al [24] 94 NA Stewart and Orizaga [25] 56 5 Champion et al [26] 496 6 Morrison et al [27] 253 3 Fisher et al [28] 62 NA Flores et al [29] 95 10 Meyer and Hixon [30] 133 5 Fisher et al [31] 522 5 Fisher et al [32] 522 5 Parkes et al [33] 34 11 Rosen and Groshen [34] 644 18 van Netten et al [35] 25 NA Pupa et al [36] 1200 19…”
Section: Authormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation