2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2004.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Host range of Ceutorhynchus assimilis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), a candidate for biological control of Lepidium draba (Brassicaceae) in the USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of eggs, larvae, dead individuals and exit holes was recorded for each single shoot. The three larval stages were distinguished by measuring their head capsule diameter (see Fumanal et al 2004a).…”
Section: Phenology Attack Rate and Gall Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The number of eggs, larvae, dead individuals and exit holes was recorded for each single shoot. The three larval stages were distinguished by measuring their head capsule diameter (see Fumanal et al 2004a).…”
Section: Phenology Attack Rate and Gall Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several herbivores associated with L. draba in Europe, including the weevil Ceutorhynchus assimilis (Paykull) [= Ceutorhynchus pleurostigma (Marsham)] (Coleoptera, Curculionidae), show potential for biological control and are currently investigated at CABI Switzerland on behalf of a consortium of mid-western US states (Idaho, Montana, Oregon, South Dakota and Wyoming), British Columbia and two Federal agencies (BLM and USDA-APHIS) (Hinz et al 2014). The phenology of C. assimilis is still not well understood and was only partially studied in southern France (Fumanal et al 2004a). Adults lay their eggs in young, soft roots of the plant, causing the formation of galls, in which the weevil larvae feed and mature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Generally, phylogenetic relatedness, or biochemical or morphological similarities with the target plant are expected to increase the risk of sensitive species to non-target effects (Wapshere 1974;Schaffner 2001;Sheppard et al 2005). Because of this increased risk, as well as the backlash from several well-publicized projects perceived to have unintended negative effects on native species (see Dudley et al 2012;Fowler et al 2012), few programmes had targeted weeds with economically important or ecologically sensitive relatives (Fumanal et al 2004), regardless of the substantial impacts that some have had on agriculture and ecosystems. However, modern molecular tools used to evaluate phylogenetic and chemical relationships that influence host plant use by insects have vastly improved agent selection and specificity, and the overall safety of biological control (Sheppard et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%