1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01218.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HOST PREFERENCE AND ALLOZYME DIFFERENTIATION IN SHOOT GALLING SAWFLY,EUURA ATRA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were found by Roininen et al (1993) in the Euura atra complex. This is not surprising because the chemical properties of galls can differ drastically from that of the host plants (Hartley 1992(Hartley , 1998; T. Nyman and R. Julkunen-Tiitto, unpubl.…”
Section: Host-plant Relationshipssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Similar results were found by Roininen et al (1993) in the Euura atra complex. This is not surprising because the chemical properties of galls can differ drastically from that of the host plants (Hartley 1992(Hartley , 1998; T. Nyman and R. Julkunen-Tiitto, unpubl.…”
Section: Host-plant Relationshipssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Thus, our results indicate that the causes for the strict host specificity in gallers (2) are not linked to the chemical properties of the hosts; the reason may be in the ability to induce galls per se or in constraints (34,36) on the host recognition system. Because gall interior chemistry is not determined by the host plant, it is not surprising that no connection has been found between galler phylogeny and host plant chemistry in the few studies that have addressed the question (15,37). Indeed, it is likely that the factors determining the probability of host shifts in gallers are fundamentally different from those in other phytophagous insects, and thus studies on gallers can provide valuable new insights into the evolutionary interactions between plants and herbivores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, a significant divergence, of about 3%, exists between the barcodes of these five taxa and five German and Finnish E. atra specimens (nearly identical with each other). Roininen et al (1993b) studied Finnish populations from five willow species, using oviposition experiments, and analysis of allozyme differentiation. They concluded that these comprise three distinct lineages, equivalent to E. atra (S. alba, S. × fragilis), E. weiffenbachiella (S. rosmarinifolia), and E. auritae [= E. salicislapponicae] (S. cinerea and S. lapponum).…”
Section: Atra Subgroupmentioning
confidence: 99%