2020
DOI: 10.1093/ee/nvaa152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Host Plant Signal Persistence in the Gut of the Brown Marmorated Stink Bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)

Abstract: Determining the host range of an invasive insect in a new environment is a key step in the development of management strategies. As the brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys Stål, expands into agricultural regions of North America, efforts to elucidate its dietary habits on a landscape scale rely on intensive sampling of potential host plants. Although this approach yields useful information, results can be biased toward common and easily sampled plant species; important hosts can be missed if sampling… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of Z. mays DNA after five days in one of the samples, however, suggests that samples collected later may still provide information of alternative food sources. This timeline differs from what was found for H. halys, fed on Lima beans and transferred to carrots, where the bean DNA could still be detected in low amounts between seven and 14 days after transfer (Hepler et al 2020). This could be due to the different plant species used for feeding, physiological differences between the two stink bug species or the use of different sequencing technologies (PacBio vs MiSeq).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The presence of Z. mays DNA after five days in one of the samples, however, suggests that samples collected later may still provide information of alternative food sources. This timeline differs from what was found for H. halys, fed on Lima beans and transferred to carrots, where the bean DNA could still be detected in low amounts between seven and 14 days after transfer (Hepler et al 2020). This could be due to the different plant species used for feeding, physiological differences between the two stink bug species or the use of different sequencing technologies (PacBio vs MiSeq).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…The trnF marker has also been used for plant detection in psyllids (Cooper et al 2019) and the H. halys stink bug (Hepler et al 2020) supporting this as a good marker for sap-feeding insects. The combination of trnL and trnF, however, provided more extensive plant identifications and better resolution in this study and it is suggested to combine these two markers for future plant meal detections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No other hosts were significantly related to adult captures during the late- and full-season. To confirm H. halys are feeding on Fraxinus, molecular gut content analysis, a technique that enables identification of host plants consumed by the target insect species and that has been developed for H. halys , can be used to identify DNA of host plants present in the gut (Hepler et al 2021). This technique could be used to document and confirm the species used by H. halys throughout the season.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far, most such studies have focused on chewing herbivores such as beetles (Coleoptera) and caterpillars (Lepidoptera) that ingest leaf or stem material expected to contain large amounts of host plant DNA, or pollinators such as bees (Hymenoptera) and flies (Diptera) that retain pollen grains on external surfaces of the body [7]. Few attempts have been made to detect host plant DNA in sap-sucking insects (e.g., Hemiptera), many of which feed primarily on plant vascular fluids (phloem and/or xylem) and, therefore, may be less likely to ingest host plant DNA [8][9][10]. Thus far, the only studies of this type focusing on sap-sucking insects have used traditional PCR and Sanger sequencing [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%