2011
DOI: 10.1645/ge-2671.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Host Mouse Strain Is Not Selective for a Laboratory Adapted Strain of Schistosoma mansoni

Abstract: We genotyped pooled adult worms of Schistosoma mansoni from infected CF1, C57BL/6, BALB/c, and BALB/c interferon gamma knockout mice in order to investigate if mouse strain differences selected for parasite genotypes. We also compared differentiation in eggs collected from liver and intestines to determine if there was differential distribution of parasite strains in the vertebrate host that might account for any genotype selection. We found that mouse strains with differing immune responses did not differ in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another caveat for any interpretation is that the marker panel used is not large and does not provide dense coverage of the genome. We are, however, able to show infrapopulation variation within these small communities, genetic drift within a laboratory strain (Blank et al, 2010), and demonstrate variation between subsamples of an S. mansoni laboratory population using a marker panel of similar size (Blank et al, 2011). Finally, there is a precedent for selection producing detectable differentiation across neutral unlinked markers (Merilä and Crnokrak; Freeland et al, 2010; Johansson et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another caveat for any interpretation is that the marker panel used is not large and does not provide dense coverage of the genome. We are, however, able to show infrapopulation variation within these small communities, genetic drift within a laboratory strain (Blank et al, 2010), and demonstrate variation between subsamples of an S. mansoni laboratory population using a marker panel of similar size (Blank et al, 2011). Finally, there is a precedent for selection producing detectable differentiation across neutral unlinked markers (Merilä and Crnokrak; Freeland et al, 2010; Johansson et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Mean error rates for allele frequency estimates of pooled samples range from 2–11% in these studies. Furthermore, we have shown in laboratory infections of mice that the allele frequencies obtained from eggs also reflect the allele frequencies of the infecting worms (Blank et al, 2011). Genetic differentiation indices using these allele frequencies also follow the known population dynamics of S. mansoni laboratory strains (Blank et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important issue for these conclusions is the sensitivity of the methods employed for differentiating parasite subpopulations. We do know that our approach is sensitive enough to differentiate the component population for the two villages, and that in the laboratory, different laboratory-maintained S. mansoni populations from the same laboratory and different lots of parasites from the same life cycle can be distinguished [12] . We were able to genotype at least 1 sample from 67% of those infected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were, therefore, less likely to contribute significantly to the genetic composition of their component populations. The relative relationship of the genetic composition of eggs to adult worms is unknown in natural infections, but in laboratory infections in mice, allele frequencies between these two stages were very similar [12] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation