2016
DOI: 10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Host Galaxy Identification for Supernova Surveys

Abstract: Host galaxy identification is a crucial step for modern supernova (SN) surveys such as the Dark Energy Survey and the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, which will discover SNe by the thousands. Spectroscopic resources are limited, and so in the absence of real-time SN spectra these surveys must rely on host galaxy spectra to obtain accurate redshifts for the Hubble diagram and to improve photometric classification of SNe. In addition, SN luminosities are known to correlate with host-galaxy properties. Therefore… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note this value for redshift reliability is related to redshifts secured for the nominal SN host. The additional error of incorrectly identified hosts (shown in Gupta et al 2016, to be around 3%) is important for SN Ia cosmological analyses, but it beyond what we examine here.…”
Section: Redshift Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Note this value for redshift reliability is related to redshifts secured for the nominal SN host. The additional error of incorrectly identified hosts (shown in Gupta et al 2016, to be around 3%) is important for SN Ia cosmological analyses, but it beyond what we examine here.…”
Section: Redshift Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The host galaxies of the DES SNe Ia were identified using the 'Directional Light Radius' (DLR) methodology described in Sullivan et al (2006); Smith et al (2012); Gupta et al (2016); Sako et al (2018) and below in Appendix A. Following Gupta et al (2016) and Sako et al (2018), we only consider galaxies with d DLR < 7 to be candidates for the true host, and also require that the potential host be classified as a galaxy based on the CLASS_STAR SExtractor output (Soumagnac et al 2015). SNe with no galaxy matching this criteria are denoted hostless.…”
Section: Host Galaxy Photometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we also note that the 169 SN host pairs have preferentially brighter hosts than the full sample and have a median redshift of 0.21 compared to the median redshift of 0.3 for the full sample. It may be somewhat easier to mismatch a host galaxy at high-z as galaxies are more difficult to detect, but we expect this to be a subdominant effect as Gupta et al (2016) finds the fraction of mismatched hosts to be approximately constant at z<0.6 in a DES-like survey (which has similar depth to PS1 templates).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We use the redshift of the host galaxy with the lowest R if it has R5 following Sullivan et al (2006). See Gupta et al (2016) for a similar but more rigorous method of identifying SN host galaxies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%