1988
DOI: 10.1093/jmedent/25.3.183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Host Digestion to Determine Populations of the Northern Fowl Mite, Ornithonyssus sylviarum (Acari: Macronyssidae), on Mature Chickens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike Lemke and Collison (1985), our visual estimates were well correlated with actual estimated numbers in the vent area examined. Time limitations conÞne visual searches to the vent region favored by the mites, but mites at a range of densities may be found on other body regions (Lemke et al 1988), and those would have been missed. Although accuracy was not good, underestimation among observers and across time was consistent and allowed detection of relative changes in mite numbers on the hens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike Lemke and Collison (1985), our visual estimates were well correlated with actual estimated numbers in the vent area examined. Time limitations conÞne visual searches to the vent region favored by the mites, but mites at a range of densities may be found on other body regions (Lemke et al 1988), and those would have been missed. Although accuracy was not good, underestimation among observers and across time was consistent and allowed detection of relative changes in mite numbers on the hens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The entire life cycle requires only 5Ð12 d and occurs on the host, where the protonymph and adult stages feed on blood (Sikes and Chamberlain 1954, Axtell and Arends 1990, Hogsette et al 1991. Mites are most abundant in the vent region (Lemke et al 1988), although at high population densities, mites may be found on many regions of the body. Mite impact on poultry egg production has varied among studies, from no effect (Loomis et al 1970) to signiÞcant reduction at moderate to high mite densities (Hall et al 1983, Arends et al 1984.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have experimented with mites on beak-trimmed, commercial caged laying hens for many years and have never seen this type of bruising commonly until the present experiments with beakintact birds. This implies that beak-intact birds were better able to grab and pull the feathers vigorously in the vent region, the specific area mites favor on hens (Lemke et al, 1988;Axtell and Arends, 1990;Hogsette et al, 1991). Interestingly, the bruising was mainly in beak-intact, mite-infested hens, rather than in louseinfested ones, perhaps implying a greater degree of ir- ritation caused by mites that appeared even quite early after infestation (within the first week).…”
Section: Beak Condition and Cage Density Effects On Ectoparasitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On hens the mites occupy the vent area ( c . 5–20 cm 2 area anterior to the cloaca), where they reside primarily in the feathers, but move to the skin to blood‐feed (Matthysse et al ., 1974; Lemke et al ., 1988). Despite its economic importance, little is known of the behaviour and ecology of O. sylviarum .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%