2019
DOI: 10.1039/c8mh00921j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Host dependence of the electron affinity of molecular dopants

Abstract: Accurate molecular modeling reveal the surprisingly large impact of the solid-state environment on the electron acceptor levels of molecular dopants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
104
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
5
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to this strong dependence, small errors in the calculation of the energy disorder lead to large errors in the predicted charge carrier mobility, demanding high accuracy of all models involved in the simulation workflow. [112] Combining such approaches with accurate embedding schemes, it becomes possible to calculate solid state properties, such as thin film ionization energies or electron affinities [17,104,113] energy disorder parameters for electrons, holes, or excited states of a pristine material or a mixture of materials, distributions of electronic couplings for charge or exciton transport [114a] and optical film properties such as absorption spectra. [110,111] Recent advances toward quantitative electronic structure methods were made using methods like GW [104] or self-consistently tuned range-separated functionals.…”
Section: Electronic Structure and Quantum Embedding Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to this strong dependence, small errors in the calculation of the energy disorder lead to large errors in the predicted charge carrier mobility, demanding high accuracy of all models involved in the simulation workflow. [112] Combining such approaches with accurate embedding schemes, it becomes possible to calculate solid state properties, such as thin film ionization energies or electron affinities [17,104,113] energy disorder parameters for electrons, holes, or excited states of a pristine material or a mixture of materials, distributions of electronic couplings for charge or exciton transport [114a] and optical film properties such as absorption spectra. [110,111] Recent advances toward quantitative electronic structure methods were made using methods like GW [104] or self-consistently tuned range-separated functionals.…”
Section: Electronic Structure and Quantum Embedding Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are other materials related issues, such as limited OLED life times due to unstable blue hosts and emitters, [9] low fill factors, and therefore reduced power conversion efficiencies of organic solar cells, [10,11] low conductivity and high costs of organic charge transport layers of perovskite solar cells [6,12,13] and low conductivity and hard processability of crystalline OFET materials. [16] The doping mechanism of organic materials is in many cases not well understood, [17] making material and device optimization a costly experimental endeavor.The development of better materials is presently based on chemical insight, in part guided by theoretical understanding, or the experimental screening of large numbers of compounds. [16] The doping mechanism of organic materials is in many cases not well understood, [17] making material and device optimization a costly experimental endeavor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many p‐ and n‐type dopants are available across a large structural diversity, there is a lack of p‐type dopants with EA ≈ 5.2–6.0 eV and n‐type dopants with IP ≈ 2.8–3.6 eV . However, D'Avino and co‐workers have recently theoretically demonstrated that the EA of dopants strongly depends on molecular host as a result of electrostatic interactions, disproving the common belief that EA is an intrinsic property of pure dopants …”
Section: Charge Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 50 ] Its HOMO energy level was measured by CV in the same conditions than P(FBDOPV‐F) (Figure S18a, Supporting Information). Assuming limited intermolecular electrostatic interactions, [ 51 ] the energy barrier between the HOMO level of N‐DMBI (≈–4.4 eV) and the LUMO level of the polymers (>–4.1 eV) should hinder direct electron transfer (Figure S18b, Supporting Information). Upon thermal excitation, the labile hydrogen atom bonded to the sp 3 carbon of N‐DMBI (Figure S1, Supporting Information) can undergo H‐bond homolysis or H‐bond heterolysis, thus enabling molecular doping via, respectively, SOMO‐mediated electron transfer (Figure S18b, Supporting Information) or hydride transfer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%