2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01576.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Host culling as an adaptive management tool for chronic wasting disease in white‐tailed deer: a modelling study

Abstract: Summary 1.Emerging wildlife diseases pose a significant threat to natural and human systems. Because of real or perceived risks of delayed actions, disease management strategies such as culling are often implemented before thorough scientific knowledge of disease dynamics is available. Adaptive management is a valuable approach in addressing the uncertainty and complexity associated with wildlife disease problems and can be facilitated by using a formal model. 2.We developed a multi-state computer simulation m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
187
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
187
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are no specific data published, however, about how CWD progresses over time in the different Prnp genotypes in white-tailed deer except for time to clinical disease and death (Wilson et al, 2009;Johnson et al, 2011). In this study, therefore, we used average rates of disease progression that are believed to be common in our study area (Wasserberg et al, 2009). …”
Section: Cwd Status At Breedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are no specific data published, however, about how CWD progresses over time in the different Prnp genotypes in white-tailed deer except for time to clinical disease and death (Wilson et al, 2009;Johnson et al, 2011). In this study, therefore, we used average rates of disease progression that are believed to be common in our study area (Wasserberg et al, 2009). …”
Section: Cwd Status At Breedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the disease threshold required to reduce cervid populations likely varies based on species demography, CWD prevalence, and other sources of mortality Schuler, 2006;Edmunds, 2008;Wasserberg et al, 2009). Another important, but poorly explored, mechanism by which CWD could affect cervid populations is by reducing reproduction and recruitment (Dulberger et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once shed, prions have been shown to persist in the environment, potentially remaining infectious and furthering disease spread long after affected deer have dispersed [1012]. If left unchecked CWD prevalence will increase slowly over time [1316] and deer population densities will decline [17,18], possibly to the point of extirpation [19,20]. Negative economic impacts are also expected due to decreased hunter confidence, decline in wildlife viewing, and increased regulation of the captive cervid industry [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The program has been successful in that disease prevalence has remained relatively constant since first detection [33]; however, the area with detected infected deer has steadily grown from three counties in the first year to 17 counties by fiscal year (FY; July 1 – June 30) 2017 [32]. The role of culling in CWD management remains controversial and the efficacy may differ substantially if disease transmission is density or frequency dependent [17]. Transmission dynamics are complex and studies assessing management techniques should incorporate additional parameters such as heterogeneity in disease susceptibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A test that enabled the identification and removal of infected animals before they become infectious would increase the likelihood that a test and cull strategy would be successful. 'Test and cull' has also not proved to be successful in controlling brucellosis in bison populations in the USA [101], and modelling suggests that culling sufficient to eliminate chronic wasting disease in deer would probably cause extinction of the deer populations [102].…”
Section: (A) Isolating Infected Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%