2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2021.198333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Host-cell dependent role of phosphorylated keratin 8 during influenza A/NWS/33 virus (H1N1) infection in mammalian cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the influenza virus can modulate the dynamics of different cytoskeletal filaments by promoting their remodeling to support viral replication [ 95 ]. In this regard, the IAV can subvert the structural organization of cytokeratin 8, enhancing its phosphorylation state and thereby promoting its replicative efficiency [ 96 ]. Moreover, it has been assessed that the influenza virus stimulated the phosphorylation of cytoskeletal ezrin, radixin, and moesin, inducing structural cytoskeletal changes and permeability increases in pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells that favor its replication [ 97 ].…”
Section: The Involvement Of the Cellular Cytoskeleton In Influenza Vi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the influenza virus can modulate the dynamics of different cytoskeletal filaments by promoting their remodeling to support viral replication [ 95 ]. In this regard, the IAV can subvert the structural organization of cytokeratin 8, enhancing its phosphorylation state and thereby promoting its replicative efficiency [ 96 ]. Moreover, it has been assessed that the influenza virus stimulated the phosphorylation of cytoskeletal ezrin, radixin, and moesin, inducing structural cytoskeletal changes and permeability increases in pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells that favor its replication [ 97 ].…”
Section: The Involvement Of the Cellular Cytoskeleton In Influenza Vi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning cell culture methods, the nasal swab was tested by: (i) immunofluorescence assay in exfoliated cells directly derived from the sample, to detect Respiratory Syncytial virus and Influenza antigens (monoclonal antibodies to Respiratory Syncytial Virus and Influenza A and B species; IMAGEN TM Respiratory Syncytial Virus kit and Influenza Virus A and B kit, OXOID), that was positive for Influenza virus; (ii) the same immunofluorescence technique after a 24-hours incubation of inoculated cell monolayers grown on a chamber-slide to detect influenza (A and B), parainfluenza (1–3), RSV-specific antigens (rapid cell culture method) performed as previously described [ 3 , 11 , 12 ]; it resulted positive for Influenza A virus ( Figure 1 A); (iii) conventional cell culture method by sample inoculation in different cell type monolayers to detect cytopathogenic respiratory viral agents by daily microscopic observation, according to previously described methods [ 3 , 11 , 12 ].
Figure 1 (Panels A): Immunofluorescence analysis of Influenza A (FLU A) antigen expression in MDCK SIAT-1 cell monolayers at 24h p.i.
…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%