Host and parasite diversity jointly control disease risk in complex communities

Abstract

Host-parasite interactions are embedded within complex communities composed of multiple host species and a cryptic assemblage of other parasites. To date, however, surprisingly few studies have explored the joint effects of host and parasite richness on disease risk, despite growing interest in the diversity-disease relationship. Here, we combined field surveys and mechanistic experiments to test how transmission of the virulent trematode Ribeiroia ondatrae was affected by the diversity of both amphibian hosts and coinfecting parasites. Within natural wetlands, host and parasite species richness correlated positively, consistent with theoretical predictions. Among sites that supported Ribeiroia, however, host and parasite richness interacted to negatively affect Ribeiroia transmission between its snail and amphibian hosts, particularly in species-poor assemblages. In laboratory and outdoor experiments designed to decouple the relative contributions of host and parasite diversity, increases in host richness decreased Ribeiroia infection by 11-65%. Host richness also tended to decrease total infections by other parasite species (four of six instances), such that more diverse host assemblages exhibited ∼40% fewer infections overall. Importantly, parasite richness further reduced both per capita and total Ribeiroia infection by 15-20%, possibly owing to intrahost competition among coinfecting species. These findings provide evidence that parasitic and free-living diversity jointly regulate disease risk, help to resolve apparent contradictions in the diversity-disease relationship, and emphasize the challenges of integrating research on coinfection and host heterogeneity to develop a community ecology-based approach to infectious diseases. biodiversity | dilution effect | community assembly | amphibian decline | disease ecology

Host age modulates within-host parasite competition

“…More importantly, young multiply-exposed hosts facilitated transmission of both parasite clones (co-infection), whereas older multiply-exposed hosts promoted competitive exclusion (superinfection). There is considerable evidence that host heterogeneity, particularly in the form of host species richness or genetic diversity within a single host species, is closely linked to parasite diversity [13,14]. Our study suggests that host age at exposure is another form of heterogeneity that can affect parasite evolution and diversity.…”

Declines in large wildlife increase landscape-level prevalence of rodent-borne disease in Africa

“…Recently, there has been growing interest in understanding what the effects of wildlife declines of this type may be for the emergence and prevalence of infectious zoonotic diseases, with active debate on both the direction and generality of diversitydisease relationships (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18) and on the likely implications for human health (19,20). Characterizing the nature of this relationship has broad significance.…”

Many species, one health

“…In the laboratory, communities with three species of hosts saw about 40% fewer overall parasite infections than communities with just one species. A community relatively abundant in parasite or pathogen species also saw a drop in the amount of disease transmission, although the effect was not as great (5).…”