2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Host age only partially affects resistance to primary and secondary infections with Ascaridia galli (Schrank, 1788) in chickens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
3
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
14
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This was usually followed by a more or less pronounced decline in egg output. In this respect our results confirm those of Idi et al (2004), who demonstrated that immunity to A. galli develops slowly and the level of protection is partial. It was also striking that flocks C, E and F became more heavily infected with adults than flock A, B and D. Worth noting is that this was not directly linked to whether the farm was organic or conventional.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This was usually followed by a more or less pronounced decline in egg output. In this respect our results confirm those of Idi et al (2004), who demonstrated that immunity to A. galli develops slowly and the level of protection is partial. It was also striking that flocks C, E and F became more heavily infected with adults than flock A, B and D. Worth noting is that this was not directly linked to whether the farm was organic or conventional.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Dubinský et al (1975) also reported that chickens infected with A. galli and fed diets deficient in vitamins A, D, E, K, riboflavin and pantothenic acid suffered higher weight loss, morbidity and mortality than their infected fellows fed a vitaminadequate diet. However, others have reported that chickens infected with a low dose of A. galli but fed adequate diets compensated for the infection without showing any clinical signs (Dubinský et al, 1973;, Idi et al, 2004. The effect of A. galli infection on chicken performance in the present investigation was aggravated by vitamin A deficiency, without apparent compensation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…This reduction is more pronounced compared with results from organic farms in Sweden [25] and is most likely due to a loss of adult worms, which could be more pronounced in hens exposed to continuous infection than it has been observed after single experimental challenge [26]. Worm numbers and fecal egg counts of flocks X2, Y1, and the treated flock, Y2, are within the range observed in layers [6] and higher than those reported from a Danish study [27] at similar stocking rates.…”
Section: Practical Impactmentioning
confidence: 64%